Analisis Perbandingan Metode CAMELS Dan Metode RGEC Dalam Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah, Tbk

Authors

  • M. Fauzan STIKOM Tunas Bangsa, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Blok A No. 1,2 & 3 Kota Pematangsiantar Sumatera Utara
  • Ali Hardana
  • Ananda Anugrah Nasution
  • Mahmud Pasaribu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v6i3.9998

Keywords:

Tingkat Kesehatan Bank, CAMELS, RGEC

Abstract

Abstract

Banks As intermediary institutions have a very important role in driving the economy in Indonesia, so banks must be managed very carefully and need special supervision from the government. The bank soundness assessment method continues to evolve, there are two newer bank soundness assessment methods namely CAMELS and RGEC. This study aims to compare the CAMELS and RGEC methods in assessing the soundness of PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah Tbk 2014-2018. This research is quantitative research. The population of this research is the financial statements of PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah Tbk. The sample of this research is the financial statements of PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah Tbk 2014-2018. The analytical technique used is descriptive analysis using the CAMELS and RGEC methods. The results of this study indicate that the assessment of bank soundness using the CAMELS and RGEC methods has different results. The CAMELS method is more focused on achieving profit and growth, while the RGEC method focuses on a combination of self-assessment assessment that emphasizes risk management, GCG implementation, and financial ratios that measure the condition of a bank. So that the RGEC method becomes a more comprehensive bank soundness assessment solution.

Keywords: Bank Soundness Level, CAMELS, RGEC

Abstrak

Bank Sebagai lembaga intermediary memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam menggerakkan perekonomian di Indonesia, sehingga bank harus dikelola dengan sangat hati-hati dan perlu pengawasan khusus dari pemerintah. Metode penilaian kesehatan bank terus berkembang, ada dua metode penilaian kesehatan bank terbaru yaitu CAMELS dan RGEC. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan metode CAMELS dan RGEC dalam menilai tingkat kesehatan bank PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah Tbk tahun 2014-2018. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah Laporan keuangan PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah Tbk. Sampel penelitian ini adalah Laporan keuangan PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah Tbk Tahun 2014-2018. Teknik analisis yang digunakan yaitu analisis deskriptif dengan menggunakan metode CAMELS dan RGEC. Hasil penelitian ini diketahui bahwa penilaian kesehatan bank dengan metode CAMELS dan RGEC memiliki hasil yang berbeda. Metode CAMELS lebih difokuskan kepada pencapaian laba dan pertumbuhan, sedangkan metode RGEC terfokus kepada kombinasi penilaian self assessment yang menekankan kepada manajemen risiko, pelaksanaan GCG, dan rasio keuangan yang mengukur kondisi suatu bank. Sehingga Metode RGEC menjadi solusi penilaian kesehatan bank yang lebih komprehenshif.

Kata Kunci: Tingkat Kesehatan Bank, CAMELS, RGEC

Downloads

Published

2021-12-06

How to Cite

Fauzan, M., Hardana, A., Anugrah Nasution, A., & Pasaribu, M. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Metode CAMELS Dan Metode RGEC Dalam Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan PT. Bank Panin Dubai Syariah, Tbk. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 6(3), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v6i3.9998

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021)

Section

Artikel

License

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Masharif al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah and Faculty Of Islamic Religiuos Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya as publisher of the journal.

Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations. The reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in databases and its transmission by any form or media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc., will be allowed only with a written permission from Jurnal Masharif al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah and Faculty Of Islamic Religiuos Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya.

Faculty Of Islamic Religiuos Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya, the Editors and the Advisory Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Tadarus are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

Rights of Authors
The Jurnal Masharif al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah And Faculty Of Islamic Religiuos Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya recognize the retention of the following:

  • Patent and trademark rights and rights to any process or procedure described in the article.
  • The right to photocopy or make single electronic copies of the article for their own personal use, including for their own classroom use, or for the personal use of colleagues, provided the copies are not offered for sale and are not distributed in a systematic way outside of their employing institution (e.g. via an e-mail list or public file server). Posting of an article on a secure network (not accessible to the public) within the author institution is permitted.
  • The right, subsequent to publication, to use the article or any part thereof free of charge in a printed compilation of works of their own, such as collected writings or lecture notes.