Dampak Concrete Pictorial Abstract Approach pada Pengetahuan Konten dan Pengetahuan Pedagogik Konten: Persepsi Calon Guru SD
Abstract
Concrete Pictorial Abstract Approach adalah pembelajaran yang mengacu pada teori Brunner, yaitu enaktif, ikonik, dan simbolik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dampak Concrete Pictorial Abstract Approach terhadap pengetahuan konten dan pengetahuan pedagogik konten calon guru SD. Penelitian ini melibatkan 45 calon guru sekolah dasar pada tahun ajaran 2019-2020. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan kuesioner dan dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Concrete Pictorial Abstract Approach berpengaruh positif terhadap pengetahuan konten dan pengetahuan pedagogik konten calon guru SD. Selain itu, Concrete Pictorial Abstract Approach menumbuhkan kepercayaan diri dan identitas guru untuk menjadi guru yang berkualitas.
Full text article
References
Appova, A., & Taylor, C. E. (2019). Expert mathematics teacher educators’ purposes and practices for providing prospective teachers with opportunities to develop pedagogical content knowledge in content courses. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9385-z
Berry, A., Loughran, J., & van Driel, J. H. (2008). Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801998885
Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American psychologist, 19(1), 1.
Chapman, O. (2016). Approaches and challenges in supporting mathematics teachers’ change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9342-2
Cheng, Z. J. (2012). Teaching young children decomposition strategies to solve addition problems: An experimental study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.09.002
Depaepe, F., Torbeyns, J., Vermeersch, N., Janssens, D., Janssen, R., Kelchtermans, G., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers: A comparison of prospective elementary and lower secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.009
Ell, F., Hill, M., & Grudnoff, L. (2012). Finding out more about teacher candidates' prior knowledge: Implications for teacher educators. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 55-65. doi:10.1080/1359866x.2011.643760
Francis, K. (2019). Play and mathematics Play and mathematics. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 17, 75–89.
Guerriero, S. (2013). Teachers’ Pedagogical Knowledge and the Teaching Profession: Background Report and Project Objectives.
Hui, C. S., Hoe, L. N., & Lee, K. P. (2017). Teaching and Learning with Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract Sequence-A Proposed Model. The Mathematics Educator, 17(2), 1–28.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (Vol. 2101). National research council (Ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Larkin, K., & Calder, N. (2016). Mathematics education and mobile technologies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0167-6
Ma, L. (2010). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Routledge.
McDonough, A. (2016). Good concrete activity is good mental activity. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 21(1), 3–7.
Olfos, R., Goldrine, T., & Estrella, S. (2014). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its relation with students’ understanding. Revista Brasileira de Educacao, 19(59), 913–944. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782014000900006
Ponte, J.P., & Chapman, O. (2008). Preservice mathematics teachers’ knowledge and development. In L. D. English (Ed.) Handbook of international research in mathematics education: Directions for the 21st century (2nd Ed., pp. 225–263). New York: Routledge.
Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2015). 10 Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Learning and Knowledge for Teaching. Handbook of international research in mathematics education, 275.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a One-Way Street : Bidirectional Relations Between Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge of Mathematics. 27(4), 587–597.
Sheridan, K. M., Banzer, D., Pradzinski, A., & Wen, X. (2019). Early Math Professional Development: Meeting the Challenge Through Online Learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00992-y
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Sibley, B. A., & Etnier, J. (2003). Review article. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 143(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2000.143.183
Sitrava, R. T. (2018). An investigation of prospective mathematics teachers’ knowledge of basic algorithms with whole numbers: A case of Turkey. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.513
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature. In Journal of Educational Change (Vol. 7, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Tall, D. (2004). Thinking through three worlds of mathematics. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education., 4, 281–288.
Thanheiser, E. (2018). Brief Report : The Effects of Preservice Elementary School Teachers ’ Accurate Self- Assessments in the Context of Whole Number Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : The Effects of Preservice Elementary School Teachers ’ Accurate Sel. 49(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.1.0039
Thanheiser, E. (2019). Family Math Night: increasing engagement in university mathematics courses for prospective teachers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1059–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1650303
Thanheiser, E., Philipp, R. A., Fasteen, J., Strand, K., & Mills, B. (2013). Preservice-Teacher Interviews: A Tool for Motivating Mathematics Learning. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.2.0137
Toh, T. L. (2017). On Singapore prospective secondary school teacher s ’ mathematical content knowledge. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 18(1), 25–40.
Van de Walle, J. A. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Yew Hoong, L., Weng Kin, H., & Lu Pien, C. (2015). Surveying its origins and charting its future. The Mathematics Educator, 16(1), 1–19. http://math.nie.edu.sg/ame/matheduc/tme/tmeV16_1/TME16_1.pdf
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 Yurniwati Yurniwati, Dudung Amir Soleh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work