A Case Study In Contract Breach Lawsuits, Decision Of The Bantul Religious Court Number: 0463/Pdt.G/2011/Pa.Btl
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30651/jssl.v4i1.30228Keywords:
Breach of Contract Lawsuit, Judge's Decision, Profit SharingAbstract
This study aims to examine the judge's decision at the Bantul Religious Court in a contract violation case number 0463/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Btl. This study is descriptive-analytical in nature, revealing key findings, which are then analyzed through the research object. This approach uses a case study method through interviews with judges. The main focus of the case study approach is ratio decidendi. The data obtained was then analyzed using a descriptive-analytical approach related to the main issues in the contract breach lawsuit. Based on the results of the investigation, the object of dispute in this case was ambiguity in the terms of the contract between the two parties, which the judge explained as a mudarabah muthlaqah contract. The judge's considerations refer to the Qur'an, KHES, Kep-Men-Kop dan UKM Number 91/Kep/M.KUKM/IX/2004, and the Technical Guidelines for Administration and Religious Courts. The judge's scientific approach was obtained through a master's program in law and socialization related to Law Number 3 of 2006. In deciding the breach of contract case, the judge used collective ijtihad amid the lack of material legal sources that have not been fully regulated in a rigid and concrete manner.
References
Ahmad, A. (2022). Ijtihad Taḥqȋq al-Manâṭ Perbandingan Fatwa Ekonomi Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah. Samudra Biru.
Akhbaruddin, A. (2013). Perkara Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama Bantul [Personal communication].
Ali, Z. (2019). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Az-Zuhaili, W. (1985). Al-Fiqhu wa al-Islâmî wa Adillatuhû: Vol. IV. Dar al-Fikr.
Bahri, S. (2016). Metode Hukum Islam. Kalimedia.
Basir, C. (2021). Mengkaji Ulang Penerapan Lembaga Dwangsomdalam Praktik Peradilan Di Indonesia(Sebuah Otokritik). Pengadilan Agama Tangerang Kota. https://pa-tangerangkota.go.id/mengkaji-ulang-penerapan-lembaga-dwangsom-dalam-praktik-peradilan-di-indonesia-sebuah-otokritik-drs-cik-basir-s-h-m-h-i/
Bin Mustahal, B. (2007). Kesiapan Sumber Daya Insani Pengadilan Agama Bantul dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pasca Undang-undang No. 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Pengadilan Agama [Thesis]. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Djalil, B. (2012). Peradilan Islam. AMZAH.
Effendi M. Zein, S. (2017). Ushul Fiqh. Kencana.
Haris, R. M., & Suparmin, S. (2024). Filsafat Hukum Islam (1st ed.). Kencana.
Jalaluddin, J. (2013, June 16). Perkara Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama Bantul [Personal communication].
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie). (n.d.). https://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/17229/burgerlijk-wetboek/
Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah. (2011). Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama.
Lisnawati, L., Muzalifah, M., Yusup, M., Kafabih, A., Faozan Syakur, R. R., & Zahro’, K. (2024). Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Az-Zahra Media Society.
Lubis, S. (2023). Hakim Menurut Risalah Alqadha Umar Bin Khottob Dan Hukum Acara. Landraad: Jurnal Syariah & Hukum Bisnis, 2(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.59342/jl.v2i1.174
Marfu’ah, M. (2013, Mei). Perkara Gugatan Wanprestasi pada akad Muḍârabah [Personal communication].
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum (15th ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Razi, F. (2013). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Lingkungan Pengadilan Agama: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Bantul Tentang Kasus Sengketa Akad Syarikah Ijarah Multijasa dan Akad Mudarabah, Simpanan Berjangka Penjamin Kebutuhan Keluarga [Thesis, UIN Sunan Kalijaga]. http://lib.pps.uin-suka.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=10428&keywords=
Razi, F. (2024, May 31). Ijtihad Hukum: Meniti Jalan Menuju Keadilan Sejati. Serikatnews.Com. https://serikatnews.com/ijtihad-hukum-meniti-jalan-menuju-keadilan-sejati/
Rifai, A. (2010). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Sinar Grafika.
Rosmaliah, R. (2013, April 25). Perkara Gugatan Wanprestasi pada akad Muḍârabah [Personal communication].
Sa’adah, N., Amirul Haq, I., Nusantara, Z., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Sengketa Wanprestasi Pada Akad Murabahah: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1/PDT.G.S/2020/PA.SMP. Jurnal Dimensi Hukum, 9(7), 54–59. https://law.ojs.co.id/index.php/jdh/article/view/736/890
Sabiq, S. (t.t). Fiqh al-Sunnah: Vol. III. Toha Putra.
Taufiqurrohim, A. A., & Al Munawar, F. A. (2022). Metode Ijtihad Dan Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim PengadilanAgama Blitar Dalam Perkara Dana Talangan Haji Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Putusan Nomor 3333/Pdt.G/2014/PA.BL. Journal of Islamic Business Law, 6(3), 1–14. https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/jibl/article/view/2651
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. (2009). Pemerintah Pusat. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38793/uu-no-48-tahun-2009
Yuwono, N. P. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Koperasi Baitul Maal Wat Tamwil (BMT)Tidak Sehat di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 18(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v18i1-2
Zarqa, A. bin M. (t.t). Sharh al-Qawa’id al-Fiqhiyyah. Dar al-Qalam.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fathor Razi Razi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
