Implikasi Hukum Penerbitan Covernote Perbankan Tanpa Akta Otentik Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30651/aca.v4i2.30725Keywords:
Banking Covernote, Notary Responsibility, Consumer Protection, Authentic Deed, Credit AgreementAbstract
This research analyzes the legal implications of issuing banking covernotes without authentic deeds, focusing on notary responsibility and consumer protection in Indonesia. Using a normative juridical method, this study examines regulations, legal principles, and relevant case studies to address the normative vacuum surrounding covernotes. The findings indicate that while covernotes function to expedite credit disbursement pending the completion of mortgage certificates, they lack the executory legal force of authentic deeds. Consequently, covernotes serve primarily as moral guarantees, leaving banks vulnerable during debtor defaults and exposing debtors to legal uncertainty regarding collateral status. The absence of specific regulations in the Notary Law (UUJN) creates significant risks for all parties. The study highlights that notaries bear full liability for the content of covernotes; negligence or falsification of information can lead to civil lawsuits for unlawful acts, administrative sanctions, and criminal charges for forgery. From a consumer protection perspective, the current reliance on covernotes places debtors in a weak position due to information asymmetry and a lack of binding legal protection. The research concludes that specific regulations are urgently needed to clarify the legal standing of covernotes, ensuring that the efficiency of banking transactions does not compromise legal certainty and justice for consumers and creditors alike
References
Ali, Z. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum. SInar Grafika.
Amin, Y. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Mengeluarkan Covernote dalam Dunia Perbankan. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58344/jhi.v3i1.67
Anggreany Arief, & A. R. H. (2025). DIMENSI HUKUM DAN ETIKA DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS ATAS COVERNOTE PALSU: IMPLIKASI TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI DEBITUR. Indonesian Journal of Legal Thought, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v8i1.7875
Devayanti, R. A., Susanti, D. O., & Tektona, R. I. (2024). Kedudukan Covernote Notaris dalam Pencairan Kredit di Perbankan. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat Jentera, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v10i1.4074
Gusti, N. P. S., Alhamdha, A., & Alfieyan, M. (2022). PERAN COVERNOTE NOTARIS SEBAGAI DASAR PENCAIRAN KREDIT OLEH BANK. Educan: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v11i1.4252
Mahmud Marzuki, P. (2016). Penelitian Hukum. Prenada Media Group.
Nurjaya, I. M. A., Sumardhika, I. N., & Widiati, I. A. P. (2020). Kewenangan Notaris terhadap Pembuatan Covernote. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(1), 421–425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.1.2535.421-425
Nurrachmasari, A., & Badriyah, S. M. (2023). Kedudukan Hukum terhadap Covernote Notaris dalam Pencairan Kredit. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(8), 6296–6302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i8.2291
Oktarini, A. A. A. D., & Kusuma, A. A. G. A. D. (2020). Peran dan Fungsi Covernote Dalam Pelaksanaan Pencairan Kredit Oleh Bank. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 9(4), 812–823. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2020.v09.i04.p10
Perdana, G. R., & Faniyah, I. (2025). Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Penerbitan Covernote Oleh Pegawai Kantor Notaris Dalam Percepatan Pencairan Kredit Perbankan. Jurnal Hukum Legalitas, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.60034/m38nj316
Pinatih, H. P. (2019). Kekuatan Hukum Covernote Melalui Pemberian Kredit Bank dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Apabila Terjadi Kredit Macet. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(3), 484–497. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2019.v04.i03.p14
Pradnyasari, G. A. P. W., & Utama, I. M. A. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Covernote Notaris Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Bank dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2018.v03.i03.p05
Rosyidah, D. A. (2019). TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM MENGELURKAN COVERNOTE DALAM PERJANJIAN PEMBIAYAAN DI PERBANKAN SYARIAH. Hukeno: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v3i2.3366
Sembiring, R. R. I. (2024). Kedudukan Covernote yang Dibuat oleh Notaris. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 4(5), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2199
Warsanti, A. N., & Saleh, M. (2022). COVERNOTE NOTARIS PPAT DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN BERUJUNG PIDANA. Hukeno: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 6(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v6i2.15720
Wijaya, I. K. D. (2019). Kekuatan Hukum Covernote Notaris sebagai Produk Hukum Notaris. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2019.v04.i01.p08
Yusmi, S. A. (2020). Akibat Hukum Pencairan Kredit Yang Didasarkan Pada Covernote Notaris. Res Judicata, 2(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v2i2.9043
Zahro, V., Hariyani, I., & Soetijono, I. R. (2023). Juridical Implications of the Issuance of Covernotes by A Notary as Basis of Disbursing Credit of Banking. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 4(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i2.43761
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 dedy stansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
