Ronald Tannur dan Cerminan Ketimpangan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30651/aca.v4i2.28289Keywords:
legal inequality, ronal tannur, criminal justice, justice, equality before the lawAbstract
Ronald Tannur has emerged as a public figure reflecting the inequality in Indonesia's criminal justice system. This case highlights alleged preferential treatment of perpetrators from elite political backgrounds, potentially violating the principle of equality before the law. This study aims to analyze how the legal process in this case reflects structural, cultural, and institutional inequality in the criminal justice system. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach with a case study approach. The results show strong indications of bias in the legal process, both in terms of treatment by law enforcement officers and media exposure. This study recommends the need for reform of the criminal justice system to ensure independence, transparency, and equality for all citizens.
References
Baihaqi, A. 2024. “Rangkuman Lengkap Kasus Ronald Tannur Berujung 3 Hakim Ditangkap.” Detikjatim 1–3.
Banna Ardana, N. N., Kurniawan, M. F., & Prasetyo, R. D., N. H. Al. 2025. “Analisis Ketimpangan Keadilan Di Indonesia: Potret Buram Hukum Yang Berpihak Pada Kuasa.” Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan 5(1):125–134. doi: https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v5i1.728.
Deni Dwi Firmansyah, &. Elza Qorina Pangestika. 2024. “Ketidakadilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia: Sebuah Tinjauan Kritis.” Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum Dan Ilmu Sosial 2(3):219–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.70292/pchukumsosial.v2i3.67.
Dilla Safitri, N. B., & Yulianto, I., V. R. 2025. “RATIO DECIDENDI PUTUSAN HAKIM NOMOR 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 1466 K/Pid/2024 DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN HILANGNYA NYAWA SESEORANG.” Jurnal Ilmiah Fenomena 19(01):N/A.
Gea Ariqah, N., Pitang, G. R., & Andryawan., P. P. T. 2024. “Perspektif Yuridis Atas Kasus Gregorius Ronald Tannur: Menelusuri Keberlakuan Hukum Dalam Berkeadilan Melalui Peradilan.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 8(2):1509–1511.
Haikal & Amarini, I., M. S. 2025. “Independensi Peradilan: Studi Kritis Terhadap Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Yang Memberikan Putusan Dalam Kasus Ronald Tannur.” Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum 18(02):206–214.
Halim Choirunnisa, S. A., & Putri, R. A., K. C. P. 2025. “Analisis Tanggung Jawab Pidana Dalam Kasus Ronald Tannur: Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities 2(1):110–117.
Harahap Ardiningtyas, A. T., & Tarina, D. D. Y., A. N. K. 2024. “DISPARITAS HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DAN TANTANGAN NETRALITAS DALAM KASUS PUBLIK : STUDI KRITIS PADA KASUS RONALD TANNUR.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 8(No 10):N/A. doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v10i2.62846.
Janah, R. F. 2022. “PENGHAPUSAN DISKRIMINASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 10(2):352. doi: https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v14i1.941.
Kaemirawati & Hidayah, B., D. T. 2025. “Pengaruh Vonis Bebas Ronald Tannur Dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum Terhadap Kepercayaan Publik.” Binamulia Hukum 14(1):69–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v11i1.7468.
M.Hum., Dr. Muhaimin S. H. 2020. “Metode Penelitian Hukum.” Mataram University Press Edisi Pertama:F. Hujriyanti, Ed.
Ridwan, M. 2025. “None.” None 328.
Wardhana Santoso, A. H., Joseph Sinatra, T. C., Nurwantoko, E. T., & Andryawan, A., A. P. K. 2024. “None.” None N/A.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revanis Rahma Dani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
