EFFECTIVENESS OF LEARNING TRAJECTORY BASED ON RME-ETHNOMATHEMATICS
Abstract
The results of the preliminary study show that the System of Linear Equations in Two Variables learning process in junior high schools tends to use direct mathematical models and presents material that is not related to daily life experiences, thereby decreasing students' motivation towards mathematics. This is the basis for designing learning trajectory in the form of activities based on students' experiences. This research is design research with the Plomp model. In the first phase, preliminary research was carried out consisting of needs analysis, curriculum analysis, concept analysis, characteristics analysis and literature review. In the second phase, the prototyping phase was carried out with a series of formative evaluations: self-evaluation, expert validation, one-to-one evaluation and small group. The trial was carried out at Al Islah private junior high school in Bukittinggi city. Based on the results of the implementation of RME-based etnomathematics learning design in class VIII SMP/MTs, it has effectively had an impact on learning outcomes. This result can be seen from the percentage of completeness obtained by students using student books with RME-based ethnomathematics where 86.7% of students were able to complete the post test at the field test stage.
Full text article
References
Normina. (2017). Pendidikan dalam kebudayaan. Ittihad Jurnal Kopertais Wilayah XI Kalimantan.
Andriyani, & E, K. (2017). Etnomatematika : Model Baru dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Gantang.
Zahroh, U. (2020). Pembelajaran Berbasis Etnomatematika dengan Memodelkan Motif Batik Gajah Mada. Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan. https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2020.20.1.1-17
Clements, D. H. (2003). Teaching and learning geometry. A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, 151-178.
Brodie, K. (2009). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms (Vol. 775). Springer Science & Business Media.
NCTM. 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Harefa, A. O. (2013). Penerapan teori pembelajaran Ausebel dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah IKIP Gunungsitoli, 36(36), 168547.
Sundawan, M. D. (2016). Perbedaan model pembelajaran konstruktivisme dan model pembelajaran langsung. LOGIKA Jurnal Ilmiah Lemlit Unswagati Cirebon, 16(1).
Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying realistic mathematics education in teaching geometry in Indonesian primary schools. Doctoral dissertation. Enschede : University of Twente.
Risma, D. A., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2013). On Developing Students' Spatial Visualisation Ability. International Education Studies, 6(9), 1-12.
Soedjadi, R. (2020). Inti Dasar–Dasar Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Sriwijaya, 1(2), 121913.
Ningsih, S. (2014). Realistic Mathematics Education: model alternatif pembelajaran matematika sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 73- 94.
Fauzan, A., Plomp, T., & Gravemeijer, K. (2013). The development of an rme-based geometrycourse for Indonesian primary schools. Educational design research–Part B: Illustrative cases, 159-178.
Armanto, D. (2002). Teaching multiplication and division realistically in Indonesian primary schools: A prototype of local instructional theory (p. 309). University of Twente [Host].
Rezky, R., & Wijaya, A. (2018, September). Designing hypothetical learning trajectory based on van hiele theory: a case of geometry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1097, No. 1, p. 012129). IOP Publishing.
Revina, S. (2011). Design research on mathematics education: Spatial visualization supporting students’ spatial structuring in learning volume measurement. Unpublished Thesis. UniversitasSriwijaya.
Manurung, M. M., Windria, H., & Arifin, S. (2018). Desain pembelajaran materi himpunan dengan pendekatan realistic mathematics education (RME) untuk kelas VII. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 19-29.
Khusna, A. H., Yuwono, I., & Muksar, M. (2016). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (Lks)Berkarakteristik Rme Materi Barisan dan Deret untuk Kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori,Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(4), 739-745.
Huda, M. A. (2013). Pembelajaran Kubus dan Balok dengan Pendekatan RME untuk Menumbuhkan Kreativitas Siswa MTs. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 1(4), 390-396.
Fauzan, A., & Yerizon, Y. (2013). Pengaruh Pendekatan RME dan Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Kemamampuan Matematis Siswa. Prosiding SEMIRATA 2013, 1(1).
Afriansyah, E. A. (2017). Desain Lintasan Pembelajaran Pecahan melalui Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 463-474.
Abdullah, D. I., Mastur, Z., & Sutarto, H. (2015). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Bernuansa Etnomatematika Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas VIII. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 4(3).
Dine Van, D. W. (2014). Development and Evaluation of a Revised Developmental Progression of a Learning Trajectory for Volume Measurement in the Early Years (Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of the Graduate School of The University at Buffalo, State University of New York).
Dahlan, J. A. (2011). Analisis Kurikulum Matematika. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka
D’Ambrosio, U. (2020). In My Opinion: What Is Ethnomathematics, and How Can It Help Children in Schools? Teaching Children Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.5951/tcm.7.6.0308
Rahmawati Z, Y. R., & Muchlian, M. (2019). Eksplorasi etnomatematika rumah gadang Minangkabau Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Analisa. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v5i2.5942
Dosinaeng, W. B. N., Lakapu, M., Jagom, Y. O., Uskono, I. V., Leton, S. I., & Djong, K. D. (2020). Etnomatematika untuk Siswa Sekolah Menengah: Eksplorasi Konsep-konsep Geometri pada Budaya Suku Boti. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i3.2900
Yani, R., & Desriyeni. (2019). Paket Informasi Arsitektur Rumah gadang Tiga Kabupaten di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Informasi Perpustakaan Dan Kearsipan, 8(1)
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing Realistic Mathematics Education. Ultrecht: Freudenthal Institute.
----------2004. “Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education”. Jurnal Lawrence Elbaum Associates. Page 105-128.
Gravemeijer, K., & Van Eerde, D. 2009. Design Reseach as a Means for Building Knowledge Base for Teaching in Mathematics Education. The elementary School Journal, Volume 109 Number 5.
Gravemeijer, Koeno. 2013. Design Research from the Learning Design Prespective. In T.Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research-Part A: Introduction. Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.
Nieveen, Nienke. 1999. Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ploom, T dan Nieveen, N.2013. Educational Design Research Part B: Illustrative Cases. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development: SLO.
Freudenthal, H. (1991) Revisiting Mathematics Education: China Lectures (Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer). Freudenthal, H. (2002). Didactical Phenomenology of MathematicalStructures. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer AcademicPublisher.
Kemendikbud. 2016. Permendikbud No 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training. Psychology Press.
Yusmin, E. (2016). Matematika ( Rangkuman Dengan Pendekatan Meta-. Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan, 2119–2136.
Hardiarti, S. (2017). Etnomatematika : Aplikasi Bangun Datar. Aksioma, 8(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v8i2.1707
Sukardi, M. (2012). Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Bumi Aksara.
Rochmad. (2012). Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika. JURNAL KREANO, 3(1).
Purwanto, dkk. 2007. Pengembangan Modul. Pusat Teknologi dan Informasi Kominukasi, depdiknas. Jakarta.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Eka Pasca Surya Bayu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published workÂ