The Role of Psycholinguistics in Language Learning and Teaching

norita purba (1)
(1) Applied Linguistics Department, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia

Abstract

Psycholinguistics has provided numerous theories that explain how a person acquires a language, produces and perceives both spoken and written language. The theories have been used in the field of language teaching. Some experts use them as the basic theories in developing language teaching methods. It is known as psycholinguistics approach. Psycholinguistic approach views learning as a cognitive individual process happening within the individual and then moves to the social dimension. As an approach, there are some methods which were developed based on psycholinguistics theories such as natural method, total physical response method, and suggestopedia method. These methods apply psycholinguistic principles that how a person acquires his/her mother tongue or first language (First Language Acquisition), learns his/her second or third language (Second Language Learning), perceives a language (Language Perception), and produces language (Language Production). Language perception refers to listening and reading, while the language production refers to speaking and writing. Listening, reading, speaking and writing are called as the four of language skills. Specifically, psycholinguistics helps to understand the difficulties of these four skills both intrinsic difficulties and extrinsic difficulties. Psycholinguistics also helps to explain the errors students do in the language learning. Moreover psycholinguistics also defines some kinds of brain disorders that affect language learning performance such as agraphia and aphasia which must be treated properly. Psycholinguistics mainly helps teachers to consider the use of appropriate method to teach that four language skill.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Alduais, A. M. S. (2012). Integration of Language Learning Theories and Aids Used for Language Teaching and Learning. A Psycholinguistic Perspective. Journal of Studies in Education, Vol 2, No. 4.

Chaer, A. (2015). Psikolinguistik: Kajian Teori. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

Claros, M.S.C. (2008). Psycho-linguistic and socio-cultural approaches to language learning: A never ending debate. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 10(1), 142-154.

Demirezen, M. (2004). Relation between Psycholinguistic Approach and Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi Fakultesi Dergisi, 17, 26-36.

Field, J. (2004). Psikolinguistics. The Key Concept. London: Routledge.

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Third Edition. London: Longman.

Harras, K. A., & Bachari, A. D. (2009). Dasar-dasar Psikolinguistik. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Bandung Press.

Jesa, M. (2008). Efficient English Teaching: Methods, Lesson Format, Evaluation. New Delhi: APH Publishing Corporation.

Krashen, S.D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Lightbown, Pats, M. and Nina, S. (2006). How Languages Are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Long, M. H. (1997). Construct Validity in SLA Research: A Response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 318-323.

Macaro, E. Continuum Companion to Second Language Acquisition. London: Continuum.

Maftoon, P., & Shakouri, N. (2012). P.sycholinguistic Approach to Second Language Acquisition. The International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW. Vol 1 (1); 1-9 ISSN: 5389-2100

Matlin, M.M. (1994). Cognition. New York: Ted Buchholz.

Ramadhan, M. A. (2013). Applied Psycholinguistic: Review of EFL Teaching Methods in Building Up the Learners’ Motivation. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Sanz, C. (2005). Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory, and Practice. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

Authors

norita purba
noritapurba1993@outlook.com (Primary Contact)
purba, norita. (2018). The Role of Psycholinguistics in Language Learning and Teaching. Tell : Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal, 6(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.30651/tell.v6i1.2077

Article Details