Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
Review Process
Publication of an article in should depend solely on its scientific validity as assessed by our editors and/or reviewers, who will also assess whether the paper is comprehensible and whether the work constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
Evaluation Manuscript
The editor will first evaluate the submitted manuscript. At this stage, the Editor carries out a plagiarism test using Turnitin with a maximum plagiarism limit of 20%. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aim and scope of SUSTAINABLE Jurnal Akuntansi. Manuscripts that meet the minimum criteria are forwarded to reviewers.
Type of Review
The review process will be carried out using Double Blind Peer Review, a review method that keeps the names of the author and peer reviewer confidential. The editor ensures that during the review process, the author does not know the reviewer and vice versa. The time required for the review process is 8 (eight) weeks after the article is received by the reviewer.
Review Report
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
- Be genuine by stating the goal clearly
- Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
- Have results/findings presented clearly and support conclusions
- Appropriately refer to previous relevant work
Decision
Reviewers advise the editor to accept or reject the article. The editors will reach decisions based on the reviewers' reports, and if necessary, they will consult with members of the editorial board. The editor's decision is final.
