Pro-Cons upon Facebook Comments of Robert Mugabe’s Speech at AU Summit 2016: Pragmatic-Stylistic Point of View
Article Sidebar
-
pragma-stylistics, hate speech on a Facebook, figure of speech.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This research aimed to describe the pro-cons figure of speech on a Facebook comment from Robert Mugabe Speech at AU 2016. The description of this research is using pragma-stylistics analysis. Utilization of figure of speech is personification, metaphor, hyperbole, litotes, metonymy, synecdoche, paradox, irony, parallelism, alliteration, allegory, meiosis, idioms, antithesis, sarcasm, epizeuxis, and climax. Data were gathered from the responses from a Facebook comment of the people to the speech delivered by Robert Mugabe Speech at AU Summit 2016 Addis Ababa Ethiopia was upload or share by A Do on December 22, 2018, at 9.41 PM. Text by text analysis is favoured in this study so that the various contextual issues can be easily construed; hence the practice and expressive means can be understood. The finding on this analysis, there are nine hundred and fifty, which pro-cons comment on Mugabe’s speech at AU 2016 are figures of speech. The conclusion shows that Pro and cons Facebook comment on Mugabe speech from the netizen is to express their feeling about African leader. The language is used freely; the cons with Mugabe are a lot because they are satisfied and did not satisfied with his leader, they cannot talk indirectly because they feel intimidated with Mugabe’s Power.
Â
Full text article
References
Al-Debei, M. M., Al-Lozi, E., & Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2013). Why people keep coming back to Facebook: Explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.032
Al-Hindawi, D. F. H., & Al-Aadili, N. M. (2018). Pragmastylistics: The Integration of Pragmatics and Stylistics. 20.
Austin_Sense and Sensibilia_1962.pdf. (n.d.).
Bagdikian, B. H. (1997). The media monopoly.
Black, E. (2006). Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (2016). Investigating English Style. 29.
Fabb, N. (2002). Language and literary structure: the linguistic analysis of form in verse and narrative. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grundy. (2013). Doing Pragmatics (3rd ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203784310
Hickey, L. (1993). Stylistics, Pragmatics and Pragmastylistics. Revue Belge de Philologie et d’histoire, 71(3), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.3406/rbph.1993.3890
Hoffman, E., Zaidi, H., Shetty, S., Bekiranov, S., & Auble, D. (2018). An Improved Method for Measuring Chromatin-binding Dynamics Using Time-dependent Formaldehyde Crosslinking. BIO-PROTOCOL, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.2905
Huang, Y. (2012). The Oxford dictionary of pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keraf, G. (2009). Diksi dan gaya bahasa: komposisi lanjutan I. Jakarta, Indonesia: Gramedia.
Leech, G. (2014). Language in Literature: Style and Foregrounding (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315846125
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire] ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nørgaard, N., Montoro, R., & Busse, B. (2010). Key terms in stylistics. London ; New York, NY: Continuum International Pub. Group.
Ratna, N. K. (2009). Stilistika: kajian puitika bahasa, sastra, dan budaya (Cet. 1). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Tarigan, H. G. (1990). Pengajaran gaya bahasa. Bandung, Indonesia: Angkasa.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2021 Tell : Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work