Relevance of Life Prison in View from the Purpose of Criminal

Kholilur Rahman; Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan; Jamalum Sinambela; Kukuh Pramono Budi; Arum Ayu Lestari

doi:10.30651/justitia.v6i2.17239

Authors

Kholilur Rahman Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang Indonesia
Samuel Dharma Putra Nainggolan Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga Surabaya Indonesia
Jamalum Sinambela Doctoral Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Prima Indonesia Indonesia
Kukuh Pramono Budi Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga Surabaya Indonesia
Arum Ayu Lestari Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30651/justitia.v6i2.17239

Abstract

Forms of imprisonment are divided into 2 (two), namely imprisonment for a certain time and imprisonment for life. Life imprisonment is a prison sentence that is served by the convict by remaining in prison until his death. This research is a legal research that uses a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach is used to find out the effectiveness and efficiency of life imprisonment as a form of punishment. This research also describes the ineffectiveness of life imprisonment and seeks to describe forms of punishment that are more appropriate to be carried out in this modern era for the sake of upholding justice and achieving the goals of punishment.

References

Ali, M. (2008). Kejahatan Korporasi Kajian Relevansi Sanksi Tindakan Bagi Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi, Arti Bumi Intaran.

Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press.

CNN Indonesia. (2022). Lapas RI Membludak, Jumlah Napi 2 Kali Lipat Daya Tampung Penjara. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220922084211-12-851075/lapas-ri-membeludak-jumlah-napi-2-kali-lipat-daya-tampung-penjara,diakses

Hamzah, A. (1985). Sistem Pidana Dan Pemidanaan Indonesia Dari Retribusi ke Reformasi. Pradnya Paramita.

Hamzah, A. (2010). Pengantar Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Yarsif Wantampone.

Izad, R. (2019). Pidana Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Etika Deontologi. Jurnal Al Syakhsiyyah, 1(1).

Kanter, E. Y., & Sianturi, S. R. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Penerapannya. Storia Grafika.

Moeljatno. (2000). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Napitupulu, E. T. (2019). Hukuman Tanpa Penjara: Pengaturan, Pelaksanaan, dan Proyeksi Alternatif Pemidanaan Non Pemenjaraan di Indonesia. Institute for Ciminal Justice Reform (ICJR).

Nonet, P., & Selznik, P. (2011). Hukum Responsif. Nusa Media.

Saleh, R. (1987). Stelsel Pidana Indonesia. Aksara Baru.

Samosir, D. (1992). Fungsi Pidana Penjara dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Bina Cipta.

Soehino. (2000). Ilmu Negara. Liberty.

Soekanto, S. (1982). Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum Terhadap Masalah-Masalah Sosial. Alumni.

Sumanto, A. (2017). Efektivitas Pidana Mati Dalam Proses Penegakkan Hukum Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jurnal Perspektif, 22(1).

Tanya, B. L. (2011). Hukum dalam Ruang Sosial (Cetakan Ke). Genta Publishing.

Tim Pengkajian Hukum. (2012). Sistem Pembinaan Narapidana Berdasarkan Prinsip Restorative justice. Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.

Tongat. (2005). Pidana Seumur Hidup Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. UMM Press.

Tueseng, H. (2019). Upaya Penegakan Hukum Dalam Era Reformasi. Restu Agung.

Umbreit, M. S., & Armour, M. P. (2004). Restorative Justice and Dialogue: Impact, Opportunities, and Challenges in the Global Community. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 36(Restorative Justice).

UNODHC. (2017). Handbook of Basic Principles And Promising Practices on Alternative to Imprisonment. United Nation (UN) Publication.

Widayati, L. S. (2016). Pidana Mati Dalam RUU KUHP: Perlukan Diatur Sebagai Pidana Yang Bersifat Khusus. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 7(2).

Wiryono, S. (2022). Ditjen PAS: Negara Kelurakan Rp. 2 Triliun Setahun untuk Makan Napi. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/09/21/15184701/ditjen-pas-negara-keluarkan-rp-2-triliun-setahun-untuk-makanan-napi