Socratic Questioning 2.0 to Stimulate Deep Learning in English Class
Abstract
Socratic questioning, rooted in classical philosophy, remains a cornerstone of critical thinking and reflective learning. However, its traditional application requires adaptation to align with the demands of 21st-century education, which prioritizes technology integration, collaboration, and real-world relevance. This article introduces Socratic Questioning 2.0, a reimagined framework that merges classical inquiry techniques with digital tools and student-centered methodologies. By fostering deep learning, this modern approach enhances students' critical thinking, creativity, and engagement. The study explores the theoretical foundation of Socratic questioning, identifies its limitations in modern contexts, and proposes practical innovations to address these challenges. Key characteristics, such as the integration of digital platforms, contextualized questioning, and collaborative engagement, are highlighted alongside implementation procedures that include teacher training and adaptive technologies. Empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of this approach in developing critical skills essential for lifelong learning. By redefining Socratic questioning, this framework equips educators and learners to navigate the complexities of contemporary education. This study particularly examines the implementation of Socratic Questioning 2.0 in English language teaching contexts, where traditional methods often fall short in developing critical thinking and language proficiency simultaneously. The research demonstrates how this modernized approach effectively addresses the unique challenges of language acquisition while fostering deeper learning outcomes.
Full text article
References
Arriyani, N., & Pratama, P. (2021). English Virtual Based Learning: Integrating Technology And Learning Media Through ‘Assure’ Teaching Mode. 10(2), 421–429.
Bikowski, D. (2018). Technology for Teaching Grammar. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (1st ed., pp. 1–7). Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0441
Coombe, C., Anderson, N. J., & Stephenson, L. (Eds.). (2020). Professionalizing Your English Language Teaching. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-34762-8
Crandall, J. (Jodi), & Bailey, K. M. (Eds.). (2018). Global Perspectives on Language Education Policies: A co-publication with The International Research Foundation for English Language Education (TIRF) (1st ed.). New York ; London : Routledge, 2018. | Series: Global Research on Teaching and Learning English Series: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315108421
Eslit, E. R. (2023, September 11). Elevating Language Acquisition through Deep Learning and Meaningful Pedagogy in an AI-Evolving Educational Landscape. doi: 10.20944/preprints202309.0658.v1
Fazal, N., Tahir, M. S., Chaudhary, M., & Abbasi, M. (2024). Effectiveness of AI Integration into Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Student Writing Skills Based on Gender. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1). doi: 10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i1.1974
Ferdian, N. R. (2017). Reflections on Digital Learning: Learning Strategies, Environments, and Opportunities. 4(2), 32–52. doi: doi:%2010.14456/rjes.2017.11
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2017). Deep Learning: Engage the World, Change the World. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin, a Sage Publishing Company.
García, M., Smith, T., & Brown, K. (2023). Integrating Technology into Language Learning: Opportunities and Challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 412–428.
Girimonte, M. (2024, September 30). The Impact of AI Voice on Language Learning. Retrieved January 8, 2025, from Voices website: https://www.voices.com/blog/ai-voice-language-learning/
Hassan Bait Ali Sulaiman, M. A. (2020). Application of Teachers’ Knowledge of Socratic Questioning in Developing EFL Critical Thinking Skills among Omani Post-Basic Learners. Arab World English Journal, (257), 1–187. doi: 10.24093/awej/th.257
Hennessy, S., D’Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., … Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology Use for Teacher Professional Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100080. doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080
Kim, Y. (2020). The Value of Interactive Polling and Intrinsic Motivation When Using English as a Medium of Instruction. Sustainability, 12(4), 1332. doi: 10.3390/su12041332
Le, N.-T. (2019). How Do Technology-Enhanced Learning Tools Support Critical Thinking? Frontiers in Education, 4, 126. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00126
Lee, M., Kim, H., & Kim, M. (2014). The Effects of Socratic Questioning on Critical Thinking in Web-based Collaborative Learning. Education as Change, 18(2), 285–302. doi: 10.1080/16823206.2013.849576
Li, M. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT for Second Language Writing Feedback and Assessment: International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 1–11. doi: 10.4018/IJCALLT.360382
Li, S., & Wang, H. (2018). Traditional literature review and research synthesis. In The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 423-457). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. (pp. 123–144). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lintangsari, A. P., Emaliana, I., & Kusumawardani, I. N. (2022). Improving Learners’ Critical Thinking and Learning Engagement through Socratic Questioning in Nominal Group Technique. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2), 705–723. doi: 10.24815/siele.v9i2.22352
Mariyono, D. (2024). Indonesian Mosaic: The Essential Need for Multicultural Education. Quality Education for All, 1(1), 301–325. doi: 10.1108/QEA-05-2024-0042
Mehta, J., & Fine, S. M. (2019). In Search of Deeper Learning: The Quest to Remake the American High School. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Muthuraman, B. (2021). Education Tools and Technologies in the Digital Age for Society 5.0. In S. L. Gupta, N. Kishor, M. Niraj, S. Mathur, & U. Gupta, Digitalization of Higher Education using Cloud Computing (1st ed., pp. 3–9). New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi: 10.1201/9781003203070-2
Oyler, D. R., & Romanelli, F. (2014). The Fact of Ignorance Revisiting the Socratic Method as a Tool for Teaching Critical Thinking. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(7), 144. doi: 10.5688/ajpe787144
Pajarwati, D., Mardiah, H., Harahap, R. P., Siagian, R. O., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). Curriculum Reform in Indonesia: English Education Toward The Global Competitiveness. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 1(1), 28–36. doi: 10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.51
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2017). Informing Progress: Insights on Personalized Learning Implementation and Effects. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from RAND Corporation website: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2042.html
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. (3rd ed.). USA: Pearson Education Limited.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The Thinker’s Guide to Socratic Questioning. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of Studies on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning and Teaching. Sustainability, 12(2), 524. doi: 10.3390/su12020524
Shahsavar, Z. (2013). Practicing Socratic Questioning in A Blended Learning Environment: An Innovative Strategy to Promote Critical Thinking. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 1(2), 184. doi: 10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.053597
Smiderle, R., Rigo, S. J., Marques, L. B., Peçanha De Miranda Coelho, J. A., & Jaques, P. A. (2020). The Impact of Gamification on Students’ Learning, Engagement and Behavior based on Their Personality Traits. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 3. doi: 10.1186/s40561-019-0098-x
Son, J.-B., Park, M., & Liu, M.-H. (2024). Language Teacher Development in Technology Integration: Exploration, Communication, Collaboration, and Reflection. Online Learning, 28(3). doi: 10.24059/olj.v28i3.3842
Thumlert, K., Owston, R., & Malhotra, T. (2018). Transforming School Culture through Inquiry-Driven Learning and iPads. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(2), 79–96. doi: 10.1108/JPCC-09-2017-0020
Torres Celi, Y. A., Ramón Rodríguez, B. L., & Criollo Vargas, M. I. (2023). Gamification on learning English grammar by using technology. In Red Editorial Latinoamericana de Investigación Contemporánea (REDLIC SAS), Investigación contemporánea desde una visión multidisciplinar. Libro 2. Ciencias Sociales (1st ed., pp. 123–140). Red Editorial Latinoamericana de Investigación Contemporánea (REDLIC SAS). doi: 10.58995/lb.redlic.9.111
Utsu, F., & Ucheche, P. (2019). Application of the Socratic Questioning Technique in Language Teaching. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3479783
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Lasmi Febrianingrum, Ahmad Munir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors keep the copyright to their work. However, by publishing in this journal, they grant the journal the right to publish it first.
The published article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License .
This means others can use, share, and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author and the journal.
Authors can share the published article elsewhere (for example, in a university repository or in a book), as long as they clearly state that the article was first published in this journal.
Authors are encouraged to share early versions of their work (such as preprints) on their personal websites or institutional repositories, even before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.