Legal Protection for Online Shopping Business Receiving Fictive Orders With a Payment System on The Site or Cash on Delivery

Authors

  • Devi Apriyanti Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto
  • Elly Kristiani Purwendah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto
  • Wiwin Muchtar Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto
  • Elisabeth Pudyastiwi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30651/justitia.v6i2.17227

Abstract

ABSTRACT

 

The implementation of buying and selling online provides many benefits to streamline time so that everyone can make buying and selling transactions wherever and whenever. However, in practice it raises several problems, such as on the Shopee shopping site with a payment system using the Cash On Delivery (COD) feature, there are obstacles that are detrimental to the seller. This obstacle is caused by consumers who do not have good intentions by disappearing suddenly when the goods arrive at the buyer's address so that the goods are not paid for and are forced to be sent back to the seller. This is clearly detrimental to the seller both in terms of material and immaterial. The focus of research in this thesis is to analyze the concept of consumer protection for Shopee sellers who implement the COD payment system. This study uses empirical juridical research methods using primary data located in Purwokerto. Data analysis techniques using qualitative methods. The results of the study show that good faith as a form of business actor's obligation to the Shopee Marketplace has been fulfilled, but there is an imbalance in the position of unilaterally canceling so that the business actor does not get his rights in the form of payment for goods. So the seller must bear the risk and the goods must be returned, and for the safety of the seller must bear the cost of resend so that COD becomes more expensive. This is referred to as the risk borne by the seller.

 

 

References

PUSTAKA

Buku

Ali, Achmad. 2015. Menguak Tabir Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Andadari, Roos Kitles, dkk, 2019. Pengantar Binis: Mengelola Bisnis dengan

Perspektif Indonesia .Yogyakarta : ANDI

Arifin, Johan, dkk. 2015. Perlindungan Hukum Nasabah Lembaga Keuangan

Mikro Syari’ah, Studi Terhadap Nasabah BMT di Kota Semarang. Semarang: Walisongo Press.

Kansil C.S.T. 1989. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, Cet Ke-8.

Jakarta : Balai Pustaka.

Matompo, Osgar S. dan Moh. Nafri Harun. 2017. Pengantar Hukum Perdata,

Malang: Setara Press.

Meliala, Qirom Syamsudin. 1985. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perjanjian Beserta.

Perkembanganya, Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta : Liberty.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. 2000. Hukum Perdata Indonesia (Cetakan Ke-III),

Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Pramono, Nindyo. 2003. Hukum Komersil. Jakarta Pusat : Penerbitan UT.

Samsul,Inosentius. 2004. Perlindungan Konsumen, Kemungkinan Penerapan

Tanggung Jawab Mutlak. Jakarta: Universitas. Indonesia.

Sasongko, Wahyu. 2007. Ketentuan-ketentuan Pokok Hukum Perlindungan

Konsumen. Universitas Lampung : Bandar Lampung.

Simanjuntak, P.N.H. 2007. Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Jakarta:

Djambatan.

Subekti, R. dan Tjitrosoediby. 1996. Kamus Hukum, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Subekti Rachmat. dan Tjitrosoedibio. 1999. Kamus Hukum Jakarta : Pradnya

Paramita.

Syafei, Rachmat. 2004. Penimbunan dan Monopoli Dagang Dalam Kajian Fiqih

Islam. Jakarta: Departemen Agama- Mimbar Hukum.

Wibowo, Arrianto Mukti, et.al. 1999. Kerangka Hukum Digital Signature dalam

Electronic Commerce. Jawa Barat: Fakultas Ilmu Komputer UI.

Jurnal

Erlina B, “Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan

Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Antara Pemilik Bangunan Dengan PT. Indomarco Prismatamaâ€, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pranata Hukum, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2017.

Hendra, May, Elly Kristiani Purwendah, Moch. Solichin, “ANalisis Prinsip Kehati hatian (Precautionary Principle) Perjanjian Kredit Pay later Dalam Alikasi Shopee.

Ines Age Santika, “Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Pada

Kasus AntaraPT Metro Batavia dengan PT Garuda Maintenance Facility (GMF) Aero Asia†Jurnal Privat Law, Edisi 7, tahun 2015.

Marnan A. T. Mokorimban, Laurens L. S. Hermanus. “Wanprestasi Dalam

Perjanjian Yang Dapat Di Pidana Menurut Pasal 378 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidanaâ€. Lex Privatum. Vol. VI No. 4, Juni 2018.

Merry Tjoanda, Wujud Ganti Rugi Menurut Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata,

Jurnal Sasi,Vol. 16, No. 4, Tahun 2010.

Sindo News, Macam-Macam Metode Pembayaran Online, Mana yang Paling

Chory Ayu Sugesti, Si Ngurah Ardhya, Muhamad Jodi Setianto, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Online Shop Yang Mengalami Kerugian Yang Disebabkan Oleh Konsumen Di Kota Singaraja†Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Vol. 3, No. 3, 2020.

Tira Nur Fitri, “Bisnis Jual Beli Online (Online Shop) Dalam Hukum Islam Dan

Hukum Negaraâ€, Jurnal Ilmia Ekonomi Islam, Vol. 3 No. 1, Maret 2017.

Lain-lain

Prospeku, “Hukum Jual Beli : Pengertian, Pembagian, dan Syarat Sahâ€,

https://prospeku.com/artikel/hukum-jual-beli---2605, 30 Desember 2021.

Nyaman?, (https://tekno.sindonews.com/read/454502/207/macam-macam- metode-pembayaran-online-mana-yang-paling-nyaman-1623593161.

Prospeku, “Hukum Jual Beli : Pengertian, Pembagian, dan Syarat Sahâ€,

https://prospeku.com/artikel/hukum-jual-beli---2605.

Populix , “Apa itu Wanprestasi? Pengertian, Penyebab, Unsur, dan Hukumâ€,

https://www.info.populix.co/post/wanprestasi-adalah.

Endah Murniaseh,https://tirto.id/wanprestasi-pengertian-bentuk-penyebab-dan dampak-hukumnya-8kF.

Satu Hukum, Akibat Hukum, https://www.satuhukum.com/2019/11/akibat

hukum.html?m=1.

Tim Daya Tumbuh Usaha, “Macam-Macam Sistem Pembayaran Pada Bisnis E-

Commerceâ€,https://www.daya.id/usaha/artikel-daya/keuangan/macam-macam-sistem-pembayaran-pada-bisnis-e-commerce.

Ifah Prasya, “Cara Pakai Fitur COD di Shopee untuk penjual dan pembeliâ€,

https://pluginongkoskirim.com/cod-shopee/amp/.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 28

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.

Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang ITE

Downloads

Published

2023-01-28

How to Cite

Apriyanti, D., Purwendah, E. K., Muchtar, W., & Pudyastiwi, E. (2023). Legal Protection for Online Shopping Business Receiving Fictive Orders With a Payment System on The Site or Cash on Delivery. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.30651/justitia.v6i2.17227