Evaluasi Penggunaan Pencuci Luka Terhadap Wound Healing: Literature Review

Authors

  • Paridah Paridah Dosen Jurusan Keperawatan Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Takdir Tahir Dosen Program Studi Magister Ilmu Keperawatan, Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar
  • Saldy Yusuf Dosen Program Studi Magister Ilmu Keperawatan, Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30651/jkm.v4i1.1855

Keywords:

Wound Cleansing, Wound Healing, Literature Review

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background : wound cleansing is part of wound management which performed to remove foreign bodies or pathogens that can cause infections in wounds to improve the wound healing process. Although it has been agreed that wound cleansing aims to reduce the incidence of infection but the reality is still debated among practitioners about the advantages and disadvantages of this implementation, so the selection of wound cleansers must be done wisely. This review literature aims to evaluate the use of available wound cleansers for wound healing. methods: Literatures was sourced from database Google scholar, PubMed, Proquest, ScienDirect, published from January 2011 to July 2018, there 14 articles were identified and after 9 filters were left. Results: from 9 articles that met the criteria, the results that showed the effect of wound cleansing use; Electrolyzed strong acid water, superoxidised, hydrogen peroxide, propylbetaine-polihesanide, povidine-iodine, chlorin dioxide, tap water with normal saline as a comparison group of the effectiveness in inhibiting infection, tissue toxicity, comfortably, timing and improvement of wound healing process. Based on the review results, it is generally stated that there is no significant difference between. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between wound cleanser. Based on this review it is recommended to pay attention to the type of wound before using wound Cleansing. Keywords: wound Cleansing, wound healing, literature review

Author Biography

Paridah Paridah, Dosen Jurusan Keperawatan Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Borneo Tarakan

Keperawatan Medikal Bedah

References

Akbar, A., Morteza, S., Jafari, S., Kiasat, M., Reza, M., & Ahrari, I. (2013). Efficacy of debridement and wound cleansing with 2 % hydrogen peroxide on graft take in the chronic-colonized burn wounds ; a randomized controlled clinical trial. Burns, 39(6), 1131–1136. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.01.019

Bellingeri, A., Falciani, F., Traspedini, P., Moscatelli, A., Russo, A., Tino, G., … Peghetti, A. (2016). Effect of a wound cleansing solution on wound bed preparation and inflammation in chronic wounds: a single-blind RCT. Journal of Wound Care, 25(3), 160–168. http://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.3.160

Chen, X., Li, P., Wang, X., Gu, M., Zhao, C., Sloan, A. J., … Yu, Q. (2013). Ex vivo antimicrobial efficacy of strong acid electrolytic water against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. International Endodontic Journal, 46, 938–946. http://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12084

Cheung, K., & Leung, P. (2016). Tap Water Versus Sterile Normal Salin in Wound Swabbing. J Wound Continence Nurs., 43(April), 140–147. http://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000213

D’Atanasio, N., Joannon, A. C. De, Mangano, G., Meloni, M., & Milanese, C. (2015). A New Acid-oxidizing Solution: Assessment of Its Role on Methicillin- resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Biofilm Morfhological Changes. Wounds, 27(10), 265–273.

Gabriel, A. (2017). Wound Irrigation. Medscape. Retrieved from https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1895071-overview#a1

Ghafouri, H. B., Zare, M., Bazrafshan, A., & Ramim, T. (2016). Randomized, Controlled Trial of Povidone-Iodine to Reduce Simple Traumatic Wound Infections in the Emergency Department. Injury. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.05.031

Jiang, R., Liang, K., Wu, S., Su, M., Chen, W., Ph, D., … Ph, D. (2016). Electrolyzed acid water nasal irrigation after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, 28(2), 176–181. http://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4015

K. Kaehn. (2010). Polihexanide : A Safe and Highly Effective Biocide. Skin Pharmacol Physiol, 23(suppl 1), 7–16. http://doi.org/10.1159/000318237

Kapur, V., & Marwaha, A. K. (2011). Evaluation of Effect and Comparison of Superoxidised Solution ( Oxum ) V / S Povidone Iodine ( Betadine ), 73(February), 48–53. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-010-0189-y

Kubota, A., Goda, T., Tsuru, T., Yonekura, T., Yagi, M., Kawahara, H., … Hirano, K. (2014). Efficacy and safety of strong acid electrolyzed water for peritoneal lavage to prevent surgical site infection in patients with perforated appendicitis. Surgery Today, 45(7), 876–879. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1050-x

Kubota, A., Nose, K., Yonekura, T., Kosumi, T., & Yamauchi, K. (2009). Effect of Electrolyzed Strong Acid Water on Peritoneal Irrigation of Experimental Perforated Peritonitus. Surgery Today, 39(514–517), 514–517. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3914-4

Lindley, L. E., Stojadinovic, O., Pastar, I., Medicine, R., & Surgery, C. (2017). Biology and Biomarker for Wound Healing. Plast Reconstr Surg, 138, 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002682.Biology

Main, R. C. (2008). Should chlorhexidine gluconate be used in wound cleansing? Journal of Wound Care, 17(3), 112–4. http://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2008.17.3.28668

Queirós, P., Santos, E., Apóstolo, J., Cardoso, D., Cunha, M., & Rodrigues, M. (2014). The effectiveness of cleansing solutions for wound treatment: a systematic review. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 12(10), 121–151. http://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2014-1746

Ricci, E., & Clinic, S. L. (2016). The management of chronic ulcers with an acidoxidising solution. Journal of Wound Care, 25.

Sano, H., & Ichioka, S. (2013). Which cleansing care is better, foot bath or shower? Analysis of 236 limb ulcers. International Wound Journal, 12(5), 577–580. http://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12167

Santos, E., Cardoso, D., & Cunha, M. (2016). The effectiveness of cleansing solutions for wound treatment : a systematic review. Journal of Nursing Referencia, IV(9), 133–144. Retrieved from http//dx.doi.org/10.12707/IRIV16011

Satishkumar, R., Narayanaswamy, T., Madhushankar, L., & Nikshita, N. (2013). SUPEROXIDISED SOLUTION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LOWER LIMB ULCERS : OUR EXPERIENCE. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Science, 2(44), 8483–8489.

Supardi, E., Yusuf, S., Massi, M. N., Sinrang, W., Tahir, T., & Syam, Y. (2017). EVALUASI PERBEDAAN EFEK ELECTROLYZED WATER TERHADAP KOLONISASI BAKTERI PADA PASIEN DIABETIC FOOT ULCER : STUDY IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EFFECT OF ELECTROLYZED WATER FOR COLONIZATION BACTERIA ON PATIENT DIABETIC FOOT ULCER : STUDY IN VITRO 1 Mahasi. Hasanuddin Makassar.

Valente, J. H., Jay, G. D., Zabbo, C. P., Reinert, S. E., & Bertsch, K. (2014). Activated Chlorine Dioxide Solution Can Be Used as a Biocompatible Antiseptic Wound Irrigant. Advance In Skin & Care, 27(January), 13–19.

Walker, S. R., & Smith, A. (2013). Randomized, blinded study to asses the effect of povidone-iodine on the groin wound pf patients undergoing varicose vein surgery. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 83, 844–846. http://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12077

Wang, P. H., Huang, B. S., Horng, H. C., Yeh, C. C., & Chen, Y. J. (2017). Wound healing. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, xx, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2017.11.002

Wilkins, R. G., & Unverdorben, M. (2013). Wound Cleaning and Wound Healing : A Concise Review. Advance In Skin & Wound Care, 26(4), 160–163. Retrieved from www.woundcarejournal.com

Wolcott, R. D., & Fletcher, J. (2014). Technology update: Role of wound cleansing in the management of wounds. Wounds UK, 10(2), 58–63. Retrieved from http://www.wounds-uk.com/journal-articles/technology-update-role-of-wound-cleansing-in-the-management-of-wounds

Published

2019-06-30