Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
ABSTRAKÂ
Hadirnya revolusi industri 4.0 dan society 5.0 menjadi inspirasi pelaksanaan kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini. Kegiatan ini dilaksanakan dalam rangka untuk mempersiapkan sejak dini, agar para guru dan siswa tidak mampu bersaing dan menangkap peluang di masa yang akan datang. Pendekatan yang digunakan pada kegiatan ini adalah participatory action research (PAR) dengan subjek dampingan yang menjadi mitra kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini adalah Madrasah Aliyah Al-Ishlah Bungkal, Ponorogo. Kegiatan dilaksanakan dalam tiga tahap, yaitu identifikasi masalah, pelaksanaan kegiatan, dan evaluasi pelaksanaan. Hasil pelaksanaan kegiatan ini adalah pemahaman peserta yang tinggi terhadap materi yang disajikan, baik tentang revolusi industri 4.0, society 5.0, dan blended learning serta keterampilan peserta dalam menggunakan Google Classroom dalam pembelajaran. Indikator lain keberhasilan pelaksanaan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini adalah hasil evaluasi peserta terhadap pelaksanaan kegiatan. Sebagian besar peserta menyatakan bahwa kegiatan sangat baik, baik pada aspek sistematika materi, kesesuaian materi, alokasi waktu setiap materi, cara penyampaian materi, kesempatan mengajukan pertanyaan, interaksi narasumber dengan peserta seminar, kualitas materi yang disampaikan, relevansi materi dengan kebutuhan, maupun kemenarikan materi yang disampaikan.
Kata Kunci: blended learning;Â Google Classroom;Â revolusi industri 4.0;Â society 5.0
Â
Blended Learning Training as an Effort to Face Society 5.0
ABSTRACTÂ
The presence of the industrial revolution 4.0 and society 5.0 inspired the implementation of this community service activity. This activity is carried out to prepare early so that teachers and students are not able to compete and seize opportunities in the future. The approach used in this activity is participatory action research (PAR) with the assisted subject being the partner of community service activities is Madrasah Aliyah Al-Ishlah Bungkal, Ponorogo. Activities carried out in three stages, namely identification of problems, implementation of activities, and evaluation of implementation. The results of the implementation of this activity were participants 'high understanding of the material presented, both about the industrial revolution 4.0, society 5.0, and blended learning and the participants' skills in using Google Classroom in learning. Another indicator of the successful implementation of community service is the outcome of the participant's evaluation of the implementation of the activity. Most of the participants stated that the activity was very good, both in the systematic aspects of the material, the suitability of the material, the time allocation of each material, how to deliver the material, the opportunity to ask questions, the interviewees with the seminar participants, the quality of the material delivered, the relevance of the material to the needs, and the attractiveness of the material delivered.
Key Words: blended learning;Â Google Classroom;Â revolusi industri 4.0;Â society 5.0
Â
Kata Kunci
Rincian Artikel
Hak cipta artikel dimiliki oleh jurnal AKSIOLOGIYA
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.
Referensi
- Ahmad, I. (2018). Proses pembelajaran digital dalam era revolusi industri 4.0.
- Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended Learning vs Traditional Classroom Settings: Assessing Effectiveness and Student Perceptions in an MBA Accounting Course. Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), n1.
- Forum, W. E. (2018). The future of jobs report 2018.
- Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended Learning Systems. The Handbook of Blended Learning, 3–21.
- Harayama, Y. (2017). Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-centered Society. Japan’s Science and Technology Policies for Addressing Global Social Challenges. Hitachi Review, 66(6), 556–557.
- Irawan, E. (2019). Digitalisasi Madrasah di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0: Refleksi Kegiatan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat di Kabupaten Ponorogo. E-Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 10(2), 160–168.
- Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. Routledge.
- Leonhard, G. (2016). Technology vs. Humanity: The coming clash between man and machine. FutureScapes.
- Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
- Ottosson, S. (2003). Participation action research-: A key to improved knowledge of management. Technovation, 23(2), 87–94.
- Pereira, J. A., Pleguezuelos, E., MerÃ, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tomás, M. C., & Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of Using Blended Learning Strategies for Teaching and Learning Human Anatomy. Medical Education, 41(2), 189–195.
- Salgues, B. (2018). Society 5.0: Industry of the Future, Technologies, Methods and Tools. John Wiley & Sons.
- Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business.
- Shiroishi, Y., Uchiyama, K., & Suzuki, N. (2018). Society 5.0: For human security and well-being. Computer, 51(7), 91–95.
- Singh, H. (2003). Building Effective Blended Learning Programs. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ-, 43(6), 51–54.
- Soemantri, S. (2019). Pelatihan Membuat Media Pembelajaran Digital. Aksiologiya: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(1), 64–69.
- Suhandiah, S., Sudarmaningtyas, P., & Ayuningtyas, A. (2019). Pelatihan E-Learning Bagi Guru Untuk Optimalisasi Pembelajaran Generasi Z. Aksiologiya: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1).
- Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended Learning Models. Learning Circuits, 3(8), 50–59.
Referensi
Ahmad, I. (2018). Proses pembelajaran digital dalam era revolusi industri 4.0.
Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended Learning vs Traditional Classroom Settings: Assessing Effectiveness and Student Perceptions in an MBA Accounting Course. Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), n1.
Forum, W. E. (2018). The future of jobs report 2018.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended Learning Systems. The Handbook of Blended Learning, 3–21.
Harayama, Y. (2017). Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-centered Society. Japan’s Science and Technology Policies for Addressing Global Social Challenges. Hitachi Review, 66(6), 556–557.
Irawan, E. (2019). Digitalisasi Madrasah di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0: Refleksi Kegiatan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat di Kabupaten Ponorogo. E-Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 10(2), 160–168.
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. Routledge.
Leonhard, G. (2016). Technology vs. Humanity: The coming clash between man and machine. FutureScapes.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
Ottosson, S. (2003). Participation action research-: A key to improved knowledge of management. Technovation, 23(2), 87–94.
Pereira, J. A., Pleguezuelos, E., MerÃ, A., Molina-Ros, A., Molina-Tomás, M. C., & Masdeu, C. (2007). Effectiveness of Using Blended Learning Strategies for Teaching and Learning Human Anatomy. Medical Education, 41(2), 189–195.
Salgues, B. (2018). Society 5.0: Industry of the Future, Technologies, Methods and Tools. John Wiley & Sons.
Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business.
Shiroishi, Y., Uchiyama, K., & Suzuki, N. (2018). Society 5.0: For human security and well-being. Computer, 51(7), 91–95.
Singh, H. (2003). Building Effective Blended Learning Programs. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook Then Englewood Cliffs NJ-, 43(6), 51–54.
Soemantri, S. (2019). Pelatihan Membuat Media Pembelajaran Digital. Aksiologiya: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(1), 64–69.
Suhandiah, S., Sudarmaningtyas, P., & Ayuningtyas, A. (2019). Pelatihan E-Learning Bagi Guru Untuk Optimalisasi Pembelajaran Generasi Z. Aksiologiya: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1).
Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended Learning Models. Learning Circuits, 3(8), 50–59.