Students’ perceptions of AI integration in enhancing autonomous learning
Abstract
The rapid development of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed multiple domains, including education, offering new opportunities for supporting student learning and autonomous study. This study investigates students’ perceptions of generative AI as a supplementary learning tool and explores how it contributes to academic performance, autonomous earning, and access to information. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 50 students at UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur through an online survey, covering frequency of AI use, perceived helpfulness, quality of information, satisfaction, and learning outcomes. The findings reveal that the majority of students use AI frequently to find references, additional learning materials, and answers to specific questions. Most respondents perceive AI as effective in improving their academic results. Students reported high satisfaction, with no respondents expressing dissatisfaction. Despite these positive perceptions, concerns were raised regarding accuracy, reliability, and limitations in specialized subject areas, highlighting the necessity of critical evaluation and responsible use. Future research should expand to larger, more diverse student populations, investigate educators’ perspectives, and conduct longitudinal studies to examine the long-term impact of AI on critical thinking, creativity, and academic development. Overall, while generative AI presents significant potential to enhance autonomous learning, its benefits are maximized only when combined with careful oversight and active engagement in the learning process.
Full text article
References
Abdullah, P. M. (2015). Living in the world that is fit for habitation: CCI’s ecumenical and religious relationships. In Aswaja Pressindo.
Azmir, S. M., & Atikuzzaman, M. (2024). Students' use of AI tools and attitudes towards using ChatGPT in higher education: a developing country perspective. The Electronic Library. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2025-0038
Bown, O. (2012). Generative and adaptive creativity: A unified approach to creativity in nature, humans and machines. In J. McCormack & M. d’Inverno (Eds.), Computers and creativity (pp. 361–381). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 3-642-31727-9_14
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Choi, S. (2019). SW 교육 보조 도구로서의 AI 챗봇 활용. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 23(12), 1693–1699.
Creely, E. (2024). Exploring the role of generative AI in enhancing language learning: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(3), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022495
Fiantika, F. R., Wasil, M., Jumiyati, S., Honesti, L., Wahyuni, S., Mouw, E., Jonata, Mashudi, I., Hasanah, N., Maharani, A., Ambarwati, K., Noflidaputri, R., Nuryami, & Waris, L. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Rake Sarasin.
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Haristiani, N. (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot as language learning medium: An inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012020
Heaven, W. D. (2020). Open AI’s new language generator GPT-3 is shockingly good and completely mindless. MIT Technology Review, 29, 1–6. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/07/20/1005454/openai-machine-learning-language-generator-gpt-3-nlp/
Hiremath, G., Aishwarya, H., Priyanka, B., & Nanaware, R. (2020). Chatbot for education system. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 4(3), 37–43.
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.10079
Mulyani, F., & Haliza, N. (2021). Analisis perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi (Iptek) dalam pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 3(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v3i1.1432
Nah, F. F.-H., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25(3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814
Ngo, T. T. A., An, G. K., Nguyen, P. T., & Tran, T. T. (2024). Unlocking educational potential: Exploring students’ satisfaction and sustainable engagement with ChatGPT using the ECM model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23(21), 1365–1384. https://doi.org/10.28945/5344
Pabreja, K., & Pabreja, N. (2024). Understanding College Students' Satisfaction With ChatGPT: An Exploratory And Predictive Machine Learning Approach Using Feature Engineering. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices, 14(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2024/v14/i1/2568
Pratikno, A. S. (2017). Implementasi artificial intelligence dalam memetakan karakteristik, kompetensi, dan perkembangan psikologi siswa sekolah dasar melalui platform offline. Proceeding KMP Education Research Conference, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Ratnaya, I. G. (2011). Dampak negatif perkembangan teknologi informatika dan komunikasi dan cara antisifasinya. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 8(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk.v8i1.2890
Rawung, D. T. (2020). Metode penarikan sampel. Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Badan Pusat Statistik RI, 22. https://pusdiklat.bps.go.id/diklat/bahan_diklat/BA_2144.pdf
Sandu, N., & Gide, E. (2019). Adoption of AI‑chatbots to enhance student learning experience in higher education in India. 2019 18th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), Magdeburg, Germany, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET46829.2019.8937382
Somasundaram, M., Mohamed Junaid, K. A., & Mangadu, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled intelligent quality management system (IQMS) for personalized learning path. Procedia Computer Science, 172(2019), 438–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.096
Suryanti, F., & Ramadhanti, G. (2024). The use of generative AI in higher education students’ writing: A systematic literature review. Journal of English as a Foreign Language Education (JEFLE), 5(1), 34–49.
Uppal, K., & Hajian, S. (2024). Students' Perceptions of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Study of Academic Enhancement, Procrastination, and Ethical Concerns. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.1.199
Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Navisatul Izzah, Fadhil Djibran, Kinanti Resmi Hayati, Dian Rachmatika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Read about Copyright Notice here