PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES ON VIOLENCEBASED DISCIPLINARY ACTION IN SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Wajid Nail Jayyid Almahdi Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
  • Muhammad Maulana Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
  • Musdalifah Adilah Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
  • Sri Rahayu Ningsih Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30651/psychoseries.v1i1.28748

Keywords:

educational ethics, school violence, discipline psychology, teachers

Abstract

Psychological and Ethical Perspectives on Violence-Based Disciplinary Practices in Schools. Violence in student discipline remains an ethical and psychological concern in Indonesian schools. Teachers often enforce discipline through physical or verbal punishment, which harms students’ emotional well-being and violates professional ethics. This study applied a systematic literature review by analyzing 10 articles published between 2015-2024 from national and international databases. The review identified four key themes: ethical dilemmas in school discipline, psychological impacts of violence on students, teachers’ emotional regulation gaps, and the need for empathy-based non-violent discipline. It concludes that violence-based discipline contradicts character education and humanistic values. A paradigm shift toward humanistic discipline through ethical literacy and emotional intelligence training for teachers is urgently needed.

References

Ananda, R., & Gunawan, I. (2022). Ethical dilemmas in teacher discipline practices: A qualitative review. Journal of Educational Ethics and Psychology, 14(2), 101–112.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.

Fitriani, A., & Hidayat, T. (2021). Kecerdasan emosional guru dalam mengatasi perilaku agresif siswa di sekolah menengah. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling, 7(2), 145–156.

Gregory, A., Clawson, K., Davis, A., & Gerewitz, J. (2020). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher–student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 206–221.

Han, Y., Yin, H., Wang, W., & Zhang, J. (2021). Teachers’ emotional labor and burnout: The mediating role of emotional regulation and moral identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103286.

Marzuki, A. (2020). Pendidikan karakter dan etika profesi guru di Indonesia. Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 23–36.

PGRI. (2017). Kode Etik Guru Indonesia. Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia.

Rohmah, N., & Subhan, A. (2022). Pendekatan disiplin restoratif dalam membangun karakter siswa sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 12(3), 345–359.

Rizal, F., & Suryani, D. (2021). Teacher’s moral responsibility and ethical sensitivity in student discipline. Journal of Moral Education Research, 5(2), 88–101.

Sari, M., & Rahman, Y. (2022). Persepsi guru dan orang tua terhadap praktik kekerasan dalam pendidikan: Antara disiplin dan pelanggaran etik. Jurnal Psikologi dan Pendidikan, 15(1), 55–70.

Setiawan, M., & Ratnasari, N. (2020). The psychological impact of teacher’s violence on students’ motivation and emotional wellbeing. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(4), 312–326.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Wulandari, R., & Nisa, H. (2021). Pengaruh kekerasan verbal guru terhadap stres akademik siswa SMP. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 17(2), 89–102.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Wajid Nail Jayyid Almahdi, Muhammad Maulana, Musdalifah Adilah, & Sri Rahayu Ningsih. (2025). PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES ON VIOLENCEBASED DISCIPLINARY ACTION IN SCHOOLS. Proceeding International Symposium on Global Education, Psychology, and Cultural Synergy, 2(1), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.30651/psychoseries.v1i1.28748