QUIET STUDENTS IN THE DIGITAL EDUCATION ERA: LITERATURE ANALYSIS ON SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL CHALLENGES AND PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING STRATEGIES

Authors

  • Jannatul Ma'wa Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
  • Aisyah Maretha Putri Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
  • Dimas Aditya Syaukani Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
  • Adelia Virnanda Putri Suhadi Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30651/psychoseries.v1i1.28727

Abstract

The phenomenon of quiet students has become increasingly evident in today’s era of digital education. The transformation from face-to-face learning to online modes has significantly influenced students’
social and emotional conditions, particularly among those who are more vulnerable to social anxiety, low learning motivation, and reduced academic engagement. This study aims to explore the psychological and pedagogical factors contributing to the emergence of quiet students in digital learning contexts, as well as to formulate appropriate psychological mentoring strategies. The research employs a literature analysis
method, focusing on five recent studies related to social anxiety, learning motivation, digital literacy, and
student engagement in online learning. The findings reveal that quiet students in digital environments often face communication barriers, low self-confidence, and a lack of emotional support from academic settings. Additional challenges arise from limited digital literacy and insufficiently interactive teaching methods. Empathic mentoring strategies grounded in Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy, Lazarus’s coping stress framework, and Goleman’s emotional intelligence model are applied to develop psychological approaches.

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.

Husen, A., Putra, A. A., & Riswira, Y. (2024). Analisis pengaruh kecemasan sosial dalam pembelajaran kolaboratif daring pada mahasiswa Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Makassar. Journal of Vocational, Informatics and Computer Education, 2(2), 126133.: https://doi.org/10.61220/voice.v2i2.20245.

Karima, R. D., Rachman, A., & Hidayah, S. (2024). Literasi digital dan kecerdasan emosional mahasiswa di era e-learning. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Teknologi Digital, 7(1), 33–45.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.

Meilinda, P., Santoso, B., & Raharjo, T. (2025). E-learning dan keterlibatan akademik mahasiswa di masa pascapandemi. Jurnal Teknologi dan Psikologi Pendidikan, 9(1), 21–34.

Oktawirawan, D. H. (2020). Faktor pemicu kecemasan siswa dalam pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 20(2),541–544. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/444222-none-a0672313.pdf.

Rahmah, F., & Pradikto, A. (2025). Dampak pembelajaran daring terhadap motivasi dan kesejahteraan psikologis siswa. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(1), 57–66.

Rogers, C. R. (1980). A way of being. Houghton Mifflin.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Ma’wa, J., Putri, A. M., Syaukani, D. A., & Suhadi, A. V. P. (2025). QUIET STUDENTS IN THE DIGITAL EDUCATION ERA: LITERATURE ANALYSIS ON SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL CHALLENGES AND PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING STRATEGIES. Proceeding International Symposium on Global Education, Psychology, and Cultural Synergy, 2(1), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.30651/psychoseries.v1i1.28727