LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE DECISION OF THE BANTUL RELIGIOUS COURT IN THE CASE OF DEFAULT AND COMPENSATION IN THE SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v9i1.25871Kata Kunci:
Default, Sharia Economics, CompensationAbstrak
This research examines the enforcement of legal principles in Sharia economic disputes, particularly focusing on the context of default and compensation in the jurisdiction of the Bantul Religious Court. Given the increasing complexity and volume of Sharia economic disputes, an understanding of how these cases are decided is crucial. There is a gap in the literature regarding the specific application of Sharia principles and law in the Religious Courts in Indonesia, particularly regarding the determination of damages in default cases. This research aims to analyze how the Bantul Religious Court applies relevant legal principles in default cases relating to Sharia economics and to identify the main juridical considerations that influence decisions on the amount and type of damages awarded. Using qualitative legal research methods, this study analyzed court decisions and relevant legal literature to identify patterns and justifications in the court's reasoning. The main findings revealed that the Bantul Religious Court sought to integrate the principles of Islamic law with Indonesian positive law, emphasizing fairness, compliance with sharia principles, and consumer protection. Key considerations include alignment with Sharia, actual losses incurred, the good faith of the debtors, their socio-economic circumstances, and the principles of equity.
Referensi
[1] Afriana, Anita, and Hazar Kusmayanti. “Review of Syaria Economy Disputes in Religious Courts within the Perspective of Small Claims Court (SCC).” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 2 (2021): 183–94. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no2.2086.
[2] Aziz, Muhammad Abdul, and Fardan Bintang Agung Sasongkojati. “The Effectiveness of Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution Between Religious Court and National Sharia Arbitration Board.” Journal of Islamic Economic Laws 5, no. 2 (2022): 216–45. https://doi.org/10.23917/jisel.v5i2.19709.
[3] Billie, Alifian, Dwi Putra, Rahmadi Indra Tektona, Ayu Citra, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Jember. “AKIBAT HUKUM BAGI NASABAH BANK YANG MELAKUKAN WANPRESTASI TERHADAP BANK SYARIAH DALAM AKAD MURABAHAH.” Jurnal Dialektika Hukum 6, no. 1 (2024): 66–78.
[4] Claudia, Margaretha Yeremia, Mahmul Siregar, Maria Kaban, and Syarifah Lisa Andriati. “Komparasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Perkreditan Atau Pembiayaan Melalui Pengadilan Pada Perbankan Konvensional Dan Perbankan Syariah.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 3, no. 1 (2024): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v3i1.281.
[5] Einsbie Grata Myn, and Ahmad Yani. “Conflict Management Strategies: A Case Study of Sharing Family Inheritance.” Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences 2, no. 8 (2023): 1927–46. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v2i8.5510.
[6] Elsanti, Nadia Ananda. “Penerapan Ta’Widh Pada Pemegang Syariah Card.” Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum 4, no. 2 (2017): 146. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v4i2.4060.
[7] Faizun, Ahmad. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Akad Musyarakah Di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Analisis Putusan Basyarnas Yogyakarta No X/Tahun 2017).” Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 6, no. 2 (2021): 195–212. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v6i2.3864.
[8] Fathiyah, Shofa, and Nurhasanah Nurhasanah. “Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Nasabah Wanprestasi Akad Musyarakah Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen.” Jurnal Hukum Replik 7, no. 1 (2020): 71. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v7i1.2544.
[9] Fitriani, Efendi Sugianto, Shylvia Andriani, Rihfenti Ernayani, and Dyah Mieta Setyawati. “Inklusi Keuangan Dan Pemberdayaan Ekonomi: Evaluasi Efektivitas Produk Keuangan Syariah Dalam Meningkatkan Akses Keuangan Bagi Masyarakat Marginal.” Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah 6, no. 7 (2024): 5195–5206. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v6i7.2406.
[10] Fredy Gandhi Midia, Hermanita, Agus Salim Ferliadi. “Upaya Bank Syari’ah Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Debitur Wanprestasi Menurut Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” FINANSIA-Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Perbankan Syariah 1, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.20595/jjbf.19.0_3.
[11] Guntara, Deny, Farhan Asyhadi, and Anggy Giri Prawiyogi. “Analisis Legal Reasoning Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Ekonomi Syariah Tentang Wanprestasi Akad Musyarakah.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 567. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i2.6392.
[12] Hanggara Putra, Alfian, and Djumardin Djumardin. “Wanprestasi Dalam Akad Murabahah.” Private Law 3, no. 1 (2023): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v3i1.2150.
[13] Idrus, Ali. “IMPLEMENTASI TA’WIDH DAN TA’ZIR SERTA PENDISTRIBUSIANNYA DALAM AKAD MUROBAHAH PADA LEMBAGA KEUANGAN SYARIAH.” Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah XI, no. Desember (2023): 185–98.
[14] Indra Tektona, Rahmadi, Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, and Slamet Ervin Iskliyono. “Wanprestasi Pada Akad Murabahah (Studi Putusan Nomor 1039/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Pbg).” Jurnal Supremasi 10, no. 2 (2020): 52–65. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v10i2.935.
[15] Kholidhah, Susi Nur. “Wanprestasi Dalam Kontrak Pembiayaan Bank Syariah Di Pt. Bprs Bangun Drajat Warga Yogyakarta.” Digilib.Uin-Suka. Ac.Id 12, no. 2 (2020): 1–19. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/34858/1/1620310122_BAB-I_BAB-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf.
[16] Larassati, Fiolenta. “Konsep Wanprestasi Dalam KHES Dan KUH Perdata: Implementasinya Di Pengadilan Agama Fiolenta.” Al-Faruq 3, no. 2, January (2025). https://doi.org/10.58518/al-faruq.v3i2.3380.
[17] Lina, Dian Aura, and Muhammad Nadratuzzaman Hosen. “Penentuan Kelayakan Nasabah Dalam Pengenaan Biaya Ta’widh/Ganti Rugi (Analisis Putusan 1217/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Kra).” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 5, no. 1 (2022): 13. https://doi.org/10.30595/jhes.v5i1.13108.
[18] Masturoh, Neneng, and Siti Haniatunnisa. “Mekanisme Penyelesaian Bagi Nasabah Wanprestasi.” An Nawawi 2, no. 1 (2022): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.55252/annawawi.v2i1.18.
[19] Maula, I, and M Zaki. “Tinjauan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Terhadap Ganti Kerugian Immateriil Dalam Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” Indonesian Journal of Sharia Economic … 01, no. 01 (2024). https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/IJSELAW/article/view/23043%0Ahttps://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/IJSELAW/article/download/23043/7264.
[20] Muamar, A, and F Rohayati. “Penyelesaian Putusan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pada Perkara Wanprestasi BMT Al-Falah Berkah Sejahtera Di Pengadilan Agama Sumber.” Recital Review 6 (2024): 31–51. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/RR/article/view/30696.
[21] Muhajirin, Muhajirin. “Ganti Rugi (Studi Analisis Perbandingan Antara Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam Melalui Pendekatan Maqashid Al-Syariah).” Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial 6, no. 02 (2018): 105. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v6i2.303.
[22] Munir Hamid, Ahmad, Syuhada, Supriyanto, and Iskandar Ritonga. “Economic Empowerment Of Ummah Through Sharia Fintech: Literature Review.” International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) 11, no. 11 (2023): 5289–5301. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v11i11.em02.
[23] Nafiah, Jihan Nahda, Isabel Zalita Putri, and Miftahul Ubaidilah. “Damai Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wan Prestasi (Kajian Hadis Tentang Damai Pada Fatwa DSN MUI No. 08/DSN-MUI/IV/2000).” El-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis Dan Integrasi Ilmu 5, no. 1 (2024): 59–71. https://doi.org/10.19109/elsunnah.v5i1.21187.
[24] Rengganis Febrelina, and Totok Tumangkar. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Dalam Ppjb (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli) Yang Obyeknya Dijaminkan Oleh Penjual.” Jurnal Akta Notaris 2, no. 1 (2023): 114–23. https://doi.org/10.56444/aktanotaris.v2i1.901.
[25] Ruslan, Dyah Auliah Rachma. “Pengesampingan Pasal Dalam Perjanjian Oleh Para Pihak Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak.” TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 3 (2023): 273. https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i3.1592.
[26] Satriak Guntoro, and Ahmad. “Dinamika Dan Problematika Ekonomi Syariah Di Negara Islam.” Syarikat: Jurnal Rumpun Ekonomi Syariah 5, no. 2 (2022): 120–27. https://doi.org/10.25299/syarikat.2022.vol5(2).10044.
[27] Setiawati, Nur Utari, and Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti. “Kriteria Ingkar Janji Pada Pembiayaan Musyarakah Di Bank Syariah.” Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan 2, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v2i2.1410.
[28] Shidarta, Shidarta. “Putusan Pengadilan Sebagai Objek Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 1 (2022): 105–42. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.1.105-142.
[29] Suaib Lubis, Mahpudin, Muhammad Dani Somantri. “Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Murabahah Di Pengadilan Agama Pendahuluan.” Mutawasith: Jurnal Hukum Islam, no. 1062 (2016).
[30] Sukmaningrum, Dyah Ayu Sekar, and Muhammad Yazid. “Analisis Akad Ijarah Dalam Praktik Produk Pembiayaan Lembaga Keuangan Di Indonesia.” Al Fiddhoh: Journal of Banking, Insurance, and Finance 3, no. 2 (2022): 81–97. https://doi.org/10.32939/fdh.v3i2.1421.
[31] Umami, Khairil. “Pertimbangan Hukum Putusan Nomor 0002/Pdt.G.S/2020/Pa.Mgt Tentang Wanprestasi Akad Murabahah.” Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies 4, no. 2 (2023): 254. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v4i2.5497.
[32] Wahyudi, Firman. “Mengontrol Moral Hazard Nasabah Melalui Instrumen Ta’Zir Dan Ta’Widh.” Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 16, no. 2 (2017): 25. https://doi.org/10.18592/al-banjari.v16i2.1357.
[33] Wulandari, Mona, and Saifullah Basri. “Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Syariah Di Indonesia.” Wajah Hukum 6, no. 2 (2022): 441. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1081.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
HAK CIPTA
Penulis yang mengirimkan artikel dalam jurnal Justisia Ekonomika harus memahami dan menyetujui persyaratan tentang hak cipta jurnal Justisia Ekonomika sebagai berikut:
1. Hak Cipta tulisan / artikel yang diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika otomatis menjadi hak pengelola jurnal atau publisher
2. Meskipun Hak Cipta atas tulisan yang telah diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika adalah menjadi haknya publisher, tetapi penulis masih mempunyai hak untuk : a). Penulis boleh meng-upload di repository kampus, b). Penulis boleh meng-upload di webnya sendiri, c). Penulis boleh meng-upload di google schoolar, orchid dan sinta
LISENSI
Lisensi atas tulisan / artikel yang diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika adalah menggunakan Creative Commons dengan atribusi CC-BY-NC 4.0
