ANNULMENT OF NATIONAL SHARIA ARBITRATION BODY (BASYARNAS) DECISIONS BY RELIGIOUS COURTS IN SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v8i2.23585Kata Kunci:
BASYARNAS, Decision Cancellation, Legal EffectsAbstrak
BASYARNAS decision should be final and binding, but it can still be canceled by the Religious Court if it is considered unfair or detrimental to one of the parties. However, in reality, decisions in the Religious Court are also often found to be weak, such as the lack of inclusion of legal basis or consideration of relevant aspects related to the decision. This research method is qualitative with the type of case study that uses a normative legal approach to examine the judge's legal considerations in deciding the case. The results showed that the cancellation of the BASYARNAS decision was granted because it was proven that there was a deception by the Respondents against the Peace Deed, and the determination of interest and fines was considered unfounded. However, the legal basis used by the judge is still incomplete. Moreover, in terms of the lack of good faith in dispute resolution. The legal consequences of this annulment are the elimination of the provisions of the BASYARNAS-MUI JT Peace Decision Number xx/BASYARNAS-xxx/xxxx so that SHM number xxx cannot be executed because lawsuit Number xx/Pdt.G/xxxx/PA.xxx is declared lacking parties so it cannot be accepted, and Respondent II must renew the contract based on the clauses in the decision.
Referensi
Abdullah, Budi. Ansari, Asmuni, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Peradilan Umum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Di Indonesia,” Istinbáth Vol 21:1 (Juni 2022).
Alexy, Robert. “Gustav Radbruch’s Concept Law,” Law’s Ideal Dimension, (July 2021), hlm. 1-14, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353967956_Gustav_Radbruch’s_Concept_of_Law.
Amaya, Amalia. “Reasoning in Character: Virtue, Legal Argumentation, and Judicial Ethics,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, (October 2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10414-z.
Arsal, Fathur Riyadhi. “The Role Of International Arbitration Institutions in Resolving Business Disputes Between Countries,” Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1:4 (2024).
Chintya, Aprina. “Menerjemahkan Kemaslahatan Dalam Putusan (Studi Terhadap Putusan Verstek Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Sijunjung).” Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Syariah Vol. 4:2 (Agustus 2023).
Elvia, Elvi Eka. “Analisis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Atas Permohonan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2023.
Faizal, Bhismoadi Tri Wahyu. “Menakar Urgensi Pengaturan Pelaksanaan Dan Pembatalan Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas).” IJLIL: Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol.1:1 (December 2019).
Harjono, Dhaniswara K. “Application of the Pacts Sunt Servanda Principles in the Settlementof Business Disputesthrough Arbitration,” International Journal of Law and Politics Studies Vol. 5:1 (February 2023).
Hayatunnufus, Nabilla. “Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama Membatalkan Akta Perdamaian Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional”. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, 2023.
Melyana. “Pemisahan Alasan Pembatalan Dan Syarat Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase.” Jurnal Hukum: Samudra Keadilan Vol. 14:2 (Desember 2019).
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014 Perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Putusan Nomor: xxx/Pdt.G/XXXX/PA.xxx.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama L Nomor: xxxx/Pdt.G/XXXX/PA.xxx.
Rosidah, Zaidah Nur dan Layyin Mahfiana, “Efektifitas Penerapan Prinsip Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (BASYARNAS),” Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law Vol 3:1 (Maret 2020).
Sitompul, Muhammad Aris Zulkarnaen. Teuku Syahrul Ansari. “Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Syariah.” Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum Dan Hukum Islam Vol. 10:3 (Oktober 2023).
Situmorang, Mosgan. “Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase (Annulment of Arbitration Awards).” De Jure: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol. 20:4 (Desember 2020).
Syafrida dan Mangisitua Marbun. “Ketidakselarasan Putusan Arbitrase Bersifat Final Dan Mengikat (Pasal 60 UUAAPS) Dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase (Pasal 70 UUAAPS).” NJL: National Journal of Law Vol. 5:2 (September 2021).
Tarihoran, Christian. “3 Perbedaan Surat Kuasa Umum Dan Surat Kuasa Khusus.” Hukumonline.com. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perbedaan-surat-kuasa-umum-dan-surat-kuasa-khusus-cl5976/.
Tehedi, “Analysis Of The Nature Of Final And Binding Decisions Of The National Sharia Arbitration Board (Basyarnas)In Sharia Economic Disputes,” International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Business (INJOSS) Vol 2:2 (May 2023).
Trihatmojo, Nanda Bagus. Adi Sulistiyono. “Prosedur Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase di Indonesia.” Jurnal Privat Law Vol. VII:2 (September 2021).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta, Agustus 1999.
W. Cristoporus Wahyo Suryo. Nurbaedah. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Pasal 70 Huruf (c) UU Arbitrase Sebagai Alasan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kota No. 54/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Kdr).” Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9:1 (Juni 2020).
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
HAK CIPTA
Penulis yang mengirimkan artikel dalam jurnal Justisia Ekonomika harus memahami dan menyetujui persyaratan tentang hak cipta jurnal Justisia Ekonomika sebagai berikut:
1. Hak Cipta tulisan / artikel yang diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika otomatis menjadi hak pengelola jurnal atau publisher
2. Meskipun Hak Cipta atas tulisan yang telah diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika adalah menjadi haknya publisher, tetapi penulis masih mempunyai hak untuk : a). Penulis boleh meng-upload di repository kampus, b). Penulis boleh meng-upload di webnya sendiri, c). Penulis boleh meng-upload di google schoolar, orchid dan sinta
LISENSI
Lisensi atas tulisan / artikel yang diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika adalah menggunakan Creative Commons dengan atribusi CC-BY-NC 4.0
