IMPLEMENTATION OF MAQASID AL-SHARIAH ON SUBROGATION IN MUSYARAKAH MUTANAQISAH CONTRACTS DECIDED BY THE GENERAL COURT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v10i1.26122Keywords:
Maqasid al-Shariah, Subrogation, Musyarakah Mutanaqisah, Islamic Economic, Religious CourtAbstract
The development of Islamic economic transactions in Indonesia has increased the legal complexity of financing disputes, including disputes arising from Musyarakah Mutanaqisah contracts. Positive law places Islamic economic disputes within the absolute jurisdiction of the Religious Courts; however, Surabaya District Court Decision Number 311/Pdt.G/2021/PN. Sby adjudicated a dispute involving subrogation connected to a Musyarakah Mutanaqisah financing contract. This article examines the jurisdictional context of the case, the application of subrogation in Musyarakah Mutanaqisah within Islamic legal principles, and the extent to which the decision aligns with maqasid al-shariah. This research employs normative legal research, utilizing statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings show that the case should have been examined by the Religious Court because the disputed legal relationship was rooted in Islamic financing, namely Musyarakah Mutanaqisah and sharia-based subrogation. The decision produced a degree of asset-related settlement, but it did not fully satisfy Hifz al-Din because the case was resolved by a forum that lacked absolute jurisdiction over Islamic economic disputes. The article argues that stronger coordination between the General Courts and Religious Courts is needed to prevent forum error and to secure legal certainty, sharia compliance, and substantive justice in Islamic financing disputes.
References
[1] Dewan Syariah Nasional-Majelis Ulama Indonesia, 2008, Fatwa Number 73/DSN-MUI/XI/2008 concerning Musyarakah Mutanaqisah, DSN-MUI, Jakarta.
[2] Asyiqin, I. Z., and Alfurqon, F. F., 2024, Musyarakah Mutanaqisah: Strengthening Islamic Financing in Indonesia and Addressing Murabahah Vulnerabilities, Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1-18.
[3] Kadir, S., Lutfi, M., Sapa, N. B., and Hafid, A., 2022, Implementasi Akad Musyarakah Mutanaqishah di Lembaga Keuangan Islam, Islamic Economic and Business Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1-19.
[4] Maulan, A., Harahap, B., and Sasmini, 2023, Comparative Analysis of Murabahah Financing Agreement with Musyarakah Mutanaqisah Financing Agreement in Indonesia's Sharia Banking System, International Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 2, No. 1, 43-51.
[5] Republic of Indonesia, 2006, Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1989 concerning the Religious Courts, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta.
[6] Republic of Indonesia, 2008, Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic Banking, State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta.
[7] Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, 2012, Decision Number 93/PUU-X/2012 concerning Judicial Review of Law Number 21 of 2008 on Islamic Banking, Constitutional Court, Jakarta.
[8] Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, 2016, Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Resolving Islamic Economic Cases, Supreme Court, Jakarta.
[9] Dewan Syariah Nasional-Majelis Ulama Indonesia, 2016, Fatwa Number 104/DSN-MUI/X/2016 concerning Subrogation Based on Sharia Principles, DSN-MUI, Jakarta.
[10] Asisah, S. N. A., Unsiyah, N., Kurnain, A. I. D., Amelia, N., and Musadad, A., 2025, Cessie, Subrogasi, dan Hawalah: Kajian Perbandingan Peralihan Hak dalam Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Islam, Bustanul Fuqaha: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam, Vol. 6, No. 2, 435-450.
[11] Yunus, M., and Raharto, E., 2022, Praktik Subrogasi Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional (DSN-MUI), Kajian Ekonomi Syariah, Vol. 4, No. 2, 15-23.
[12] Surabaya District Court, 2021, Decision Number 311/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Sby, Surabaya District Court, Surabaya.
[13] Wicaksono, K. B., and Paulus, D. H., 2021, Penyelesaian Klaim dan Subrogasi oleh Perusahaan Surety dalam Perjanjian Surety Bond, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, Vol. 5, No. 1, 148-160.
[14] Nurdin, M., and Ismail, F., 2022, Judicial Implementation of Maqasid Al-Shariah in Islamic Economic Dispute Resolution, Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Society, Vol. 5, No. 1, 55-74.
[15] Ariska, I., Ula, T., and Maulana, Z., 2025, The Application of Maqasid Principles in the Resolution of Islamic Banking Disputes in Kota Langsa, Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam, Vol. 17, No. 1, 326-338.
[16] Al-Nahari, A. A. A. Q., Monawer, A. T. M., Abdullah, L. B. H., Ali, A. K. B., Rahman, N. N. B. A., and Achour, M., 2022, Common Conceptual Flaws in Realizing Maqasid al-Shariah vis-a-vis Islamic Finance, ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, Vol. 14, No. 2, 190-205.
[17] Widjaja, G., 2025, Dispute Resolution in Islamic Economic Transactions, Journal of Islamic Economic Laws, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1-18.
[18] Hutomo, B. S., Setiono, D. S., and Chaniago, G. M. N., 2024, Sekuritisasi Aset Beragun Recovery Subrogasi pada Produk Kontra Bank Garansi pada Perusahaan Asuransi, UNES Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 3, 8756-8765.
[19] Almuhtasib, A. S., and Muhajirin, 2024, Konsep Akad Musyarakah Mutanaqishah dalam Pengembangan Sistem Murabahah terhadap Bisnis Property, Himmah: Jurnal Kajian Islam Kontemporer, Vol. 8, No. 1, 897-914.
[20] Sari, E. W., Mursalin, S., and Hartini, K., 2024, Peranan Pembiayaan Musyarakah Mutanaqishah (MMQ) Bank Syariah Indonesia pada Pengembangan UMKM di Kota Bengkulu, Jurnal Tabarru': Islamic Banking and Finance, Vol. 7, No. 1, 165-175.
[21] Jumarni, J., Fathurrahman, F., and Katman, M. N., 2023, Analisis Pembiayaan Properti Menggunakan Akad Musyarakah Mutanaqisah pada Perumahan Griya Hartacu Pattallassang Kabupaten Gowa, Investama: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol. 9, No. 2, 105-120.
[22] Ulum, K. M., Fuad, A. Z., Khairunnisa, M., Mawadah, A. R., and Pratama, M. R. A., 2024, Tipologi Multiakad dalam Fatwa Ekonomi Digital Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia, Adzkiya: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syariah, Vol. 12, No. 2, 61-84.
[23] Nugroho, B., Ma'rufi, A., Fathudin, F., Jankauskiene, D., and Lousada, S. A. N., 2024, Cultural Integration in Islamic Financial Innovation: Implementation of Istishlahi Principles in Musyarakah Mutanaqishah Contracts in Multicultural Indonesia, Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, 173-185.
[24] Warsidi, W., Khan, S. U., and Suhartono, 2025, Implementasi Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘ah dalam Pertimbangan Hakim pada Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, Vol. 14, No. 3, DOI: 10.30651/mqsd.v14i3.28691.
[25] Warsidi, W., Suhartono, and Swadjaja, I., 2025, Tinjauan Hukum Islam terhadap Interseksi Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah dan Hukum Perwakafan, Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, Vol. 10, No. 2, DOI: 10.30651/jms.v10i2.27386.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
HAK CIPTA
Penulis yang mengirimkan artikel dalam jurnal Justisia Ekonomika harus memahami dan menyetujui persyaratan tentang hak cipta jurnal Justisia Ekonomika sebagai berikut:
1. Hak Cipta tulisan / artikel yang diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika otomatis menjadi hak pengelola jurnal atau publisher
2. Meskipun Hak Cipta atas tulisan yang telah diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika adalah menjadi haknya publisher, tetapi penulis masih mempunyai hak untuk : a). Penulis boleh meng-upload di repository kampus, b). Penulis boleh meng-upload di webnya sendiri, c). Penulis boleh meng-upload di google schoolar, orchid dan sinta
LISENSI
Lisensi atas tulisan / artikel yang diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika adalah menggunakan Creative Commons dengan atribusi CC-BY-NC 4.0
