DISPUTE RESOLUTION OF MUDHARABAH CONTRACT FINANCING THROUGH BASYARNAS

Authors

  • M Syafrie Ramadhan UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Bagus Kusumo Hadi UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Dino Gautman Raharjo UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • M. Fadhil Azzam Arfa UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Muhammad Alvin Saputra UIN Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v8i1.21285

Keywords:

dispute resolution, mudharabah financing, basyarnas

Abstract

Mudarabah financing disputes in Islamic banking are generally resolved using litigation or judicial channels. As stated in Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, there are also other channels in dispute resolution, namely arbitration and alternative dispute resolution such as; mediation. As contained in the financing contract in Islamic banking Law No. 21 of 2008 states that dispute resolution will be resolved through BASYARNAS if in the agreement clause a dispute occurs it will be determined through a Sharia arbitrator in this case BASYARNAS this is the authority for BASYARNAS. The settlement of mudharabah disputes in Islamic banking is said to be a default, not only judged by the losses obtained by the creditor (Bank) but can also come from the beginning of the loss. If the customer's negligence causes the default, then this can be the customer's responsibility as the owner of the capital, and he bears the loss. In principle, there is no compensation for mudharabah because it is Amanah. Still, if the loss comes from the negligence of the Islamic Bank, it will be borne by the Islamic Bank as long as the failure or loss is not caused by the owner of the capital (mudharib). if there is a dispute between the two parties to the mudharabah financing contract agreement, the settlement will be resolved through arbitration (BASYARNAS). This statement authorizes BASYARNAS to resolve disputes for the parties to the dispute according to the agreed agreement.

References

Adityanto, Ridzky. “Kedudukan Basyarnas Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/Puu-X/2012).” Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal 1 No 2 (2016). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v1i2.15.

Dhahir, Husain Sahatah dan Siddiq Muh Al Amin Adh. Transaksi Dan Etika Bisnis Islam. Insani Publishing, 2005.

Hakim, Aminudin Dan Zainal. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013.

Keuangan, Otoritas Jasa. “Konsep Operasional Bank Syariah.” Tentang Syariah, 2024. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/tentang-syariah/Pages/Konsep-Operasional-PBS.aspx.

Khairandy, Ridwan. Hukum Kontrak Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan (Bagian Pertama). Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2013.

Moustafa Elmetwaly Kandeel, A Abouahmed, and A Zakaria. “The Premature Expiration of Arbitration Litigation in Investment Disputes,” Corporate Law and Governance 5 No 1 (2023): 17–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv5i1p2.

Mujahidin, Ahmad. Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia. Bogor: Galia Indonesia, 2010.

Mujib, Riska Fauziyah Hayati and Abdul. “Dispute Resolution on Muḍārabah Musytarakah Contract on Sharia Insurance in Indonesia: Between Regulation and Practice.” El-Mashlahah 12 No. 1 (2022): 14–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v12i1.3795.

Muttaqien, Dadan dan Fakhruddin Cikman. Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media, 2008.

Nur, Mohamad. “Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Akad Murabahah (Jual-Beli) Antara Bank Syariah - X Dengan PT AS Di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional -Majelis Ulama Indonesia (BASYARNAS-MUI).” AKSARA 06 No.02 (2020). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37905/aksara.6.2.161-170.2020.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, “Konsep Operasional Bank Syariah,” Tentang Syariah, 2024, https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/tentang-syariah/Pages/Konsep-Operasional-PBS.aspx

(PPHIMM), Pusat Pengkajian Hukum Islam dan Masyarakat Madani. Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Prakoso, Andria Luhur. “‘Tinjauan Terhadap Arbitrase Syariah Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Bidang Perbankan Syariah,.’” Jurnal Jurisprudence 7 No. 1 (2017): 59–67.

Ridwan, Murthado. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia.” MALIA: Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance 1 No. 1 (2018): 45–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21043/malia.v1i1.3983.

Rosidah, Zaidah Nur, and Layyin Mahfiana. “Efektivitas Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas).” TAWAZUN : Journal of Sharia Economic Law 3, no. 1 (2020): 15. https://doi.org/10.21043/tawazun.v3i1.7529.

Sakti, Muthia, and Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih. “TANGGUNG JAWAB BADAN ARBITRASE SYARIAH NASIONAL (BASYARNAS) DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH.” Jurnal Yuridis 4 No 1 (2017). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i1.135.

Santriati, Amanda Tikha. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional.” El- Wasathiya: Jurnal Studi Agama 9, No. 1 (2021): 38–54.

Sari, Nilam. Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Melalui Lembaga Arbitrase. Banda Aceh: Yayasan PENA, 2016.

Sudarsono. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.

Tektona, Rahmadi Indra. “Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Anak Korban Perceraian.” Muwazah: Jurnal Kajian Gender 4 No. 1 (2012): 42–57.

Warsidi. Strategi Pemasaran Produk Bank Syariah. Yogyakarta: Zahir Publishing, 2023.

Yunita, Ani. “Efektifitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 9 No. 1 (2021): 25–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.9.1.25-36.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-20

How to Cite

Ramadhan, M. S., Kusumo Hadi, B., Gautman Raharjo, D., Azzam Arfa, M. F., & Saputra, M. A. (2024). DISPUTE RESOLUTION OF MUDHARABAH CONTRACT FINANCING THROUGH BASYARNAS. Journal Justisia Ekonomika: Master of Sharia Economic Law, 8(1), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v8i1.21285

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Juni

Section

Artikel

License

HAK CIPTA 

Penulis yang mengirimkan artikel dalam jurnal Justisia Ekonomika harus memahami dan menyetujui persyaratan tentang hak cipta jurnal Justisia Ekonomika sebagai berikut:

1. Hak Cipta tulisan / artikel yang diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika otomatis menjadi hak pengelola jurnal atau publisher

2. Meskipun Hak Cipta atas tulisan yang telah diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika adalah menjadi haknya publisher, tetapi penulis masih mempunyai hak untuk : a). Penulis boleh meng-upload di repository kampus, b). Penulis boleh meng-upload di webnya sendiri, c). Penulis boleh meng-upload di google schoolar, orchid dan sinta

 

LISENSI

Lisensi atas tulisan / artikel yang diterbitkan di jurnal Justisia Ekonomika adalah menggunakan Creative Commons dengan atribusi CC-BY-NC 4.0