Bilah Samping Artikel

Telah diserahkan
Januari 9, 2020
Diterima
Februari 20, 2021
Diterbitkan
Agustus 18, 2021
Unduh
PDF
Statistik
Baca Penghitung : 397 Unduh : 377

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

e-Government adalah pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam proses pemerintahan untuk meningkatkan efisiensi, efektivitas, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Fokus penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis tingkat pengaruh Kreativitas dan Inovasi pada Keberhasilan Implementasi e-Kelurahan Gunung Panjang melalui Kinerja Aparatur. Untuk mengetahui pengaruhnya, maka digunakan metode Path Analysis. Jenis data primer atau langsung berbasis teknik wawancara terhadap 91 responden pada Agustus-November 2019. Temuan empiris membuktikan bahwa: (1) Kreativitas dan Inovasi secara langsung memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap Kinerja Aparatur Kelurahan Gunung Panjang Samarinda; (2) Kreativitas dan Inovasi secara langsung memiliki pengaruh yang positif signifikan terhadap Keberhasilan Implementasi e-Kelurahan Gunung Panjang Samarinda; (3) Kinerja Aparatur Langsung memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap Keberhasilan Implementasi e-Kelurahan Gunung Panjang Samarinda; dan (4) Kreativitas dan Inovasi secara tidak langsung memiliki pengaruh yang positif terhadap Keberhasilan Implementasi e-Kelurahan Gunung Panjang melalui Aparatur Kinerja.

Kata Kunci: kantor publik; pegawai negeri sipil; teknologi dan informasi; analisis jalur.


To what extent is the performance of the apparatus in determining the creativity and innovation of the e-Kelurahan's success? A Case

ABSTRACT 

In the digital era, the use of technology and information has grown very rapidly to help humans in their daily work. This is inseparable from the demands of private companies and public agencies, in order to create a professional character for employees in a sustainable manner. We try to highlight the influence of creativity and innovation on the successful implementation of e-Kelurahan with the role of apparatus performance in Sidomolyo Village, Samarinda City. Path analysis techniques are used to answer the objectives and proposed hypotheses. Data interpretation was supported by survey data for 100 informant units in 2019. They are civilians who are domiciled and are taking care of the administrative needs that get services in the Sidmolyo area, so the purposive sampling technique is very appropriate to describe the characteristics of the informants. As a result, this finding concludes that creativity and innovation have a significant effect on personnel performance. from other direct influences, creativity and innovation have a significant impact on the successful implementation of e-Kelurahan. Then, the performance of the apparatus also has a significant effect on the success of implementing e-Kelurahan. Finally, especially for the indirect effect, creativity and innovation have had a significant effect on the success of implementing e-Kelurahan with the role of good apparatus performance. This study indicates that for theoretical and practical purposes, it is necessary to support the success of public services that synergize human resources and digitalization.

Keywords: public office; civil servants; technology and information; path analysis.

Kata Kunci

kreativitas inovasi kinerja aparatur penerapan e-kelurahan

Rincian Artikel

Lisensi

Hak cipta artikel dimiliki oleh jurnal AKSIOLOGIYA

Lisensi Creative Commons

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.

Biografi Penulis

Dio Caisar Darma, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Samarinda

Management, Tenaga Pengajar

Referensi

  1. Anggadwita, G., & Dhewanto, W. (2013), Service innovation in public sector: a case study on PT. Kereta Api Indonesia. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 4(7), 308-315.
  2. Anggadwita, G., Luturlean, B.S., Ramadani, V., & Ratten, V. (2017). Socio-cultural environments and emerging economy entrepreneurship: women entrepreneurs in Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9(1), 85-96.
  3. Anonim. (2006). Keputusan Presiden Nomor 20 Tahun 2006 tentang e-Government. Jakarta.
  4. Anonim. (2014). Peraturan Daerah No. 06 Tahun 2014 tentang pemekaran Kelurahan di Kota Samarinda. Samarinda.
  5. Arikunto, S. (1996). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  6. Bennett, J.K., & O’Brien, M.J. (1994). The Building Blocks of the Learning Organization. Training, 31(6), 41-48.
  7. Beyer, J.M., & Trice, H.M. (1978). Implementing change. New York: Free Press.
  8. Dahiyat, S.E. (2015). An integrated model of knowledge acquisition and innovation: examining the mediation effects of knowledge integration and knowledge application. International Journal of Learning and Change, 8(2), 101-135.
  9. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
  10. Dhewanto, W., Lantu, D.C., Herliana, S., & Anggadwita, G. (2015). The innovation cluster of ICT start-up companies in developing countries: case of bandung, Indonesia. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 32-46.
  11. Ernst & Young. (2017). Public Sector Innovatiom: From Idea to Action. Canada: Ernst & Young LLP.
  12. Gloet, M., & Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 402-409.
  13. Hage, J. (1980). Theories of organizations. New York: Wiley
  14. Hill, K.G., & Amabile, T.M. (1993). A Social Psychological Perspective on Creativity: Intrinsic Motivation and Creativity in the Classroom and Workplace. In Understanding and Recognizing Creativity: The Emergence of a Discipline, edited by S. G. Isaksen, M.C. Murdock, R. L. Firestien, and D. J. Treffinger. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  15. Huang, F., Huang, F., Gardner, S., Gardner, S., Moayer, S., & Moayer, S. (2016). Towards a framework for strategic knowledge management practice: Integrating soft and hard systems for competitive advantage. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46(4), 492-507.
  16. Inkinen, H.T., Kianto, A., & Vanhala, M. (2015). Knowledge management practices and innovation performance in Finland. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(4), 432-455.
  17. Johnson, J.R. (2002). Leading the learning organization: portrait of four leaders. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 23(5), 241-249.
  18. Kaufmann, D., & Kray, A. (2016). Worldwide governance indicators. Penelusuran pada: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home (akses 08 Januari 2020).
  19. Klein, K.J., & Sorra, J.S. (1996). The Challenge of Innovation Implementation. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055-1080.
  20. Kuncoro, M. (2008). Metode Riset Untuk Bisnis & Ekonomi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  21. Mangkunegara, A.P. (2007). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  22. Nord, W.R., & Tucker, S. (1987). Implementing routine and radical innovations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  23. Palm, K., Lilja, J., & Wiklund, H. (2015). Agencies, it’s time to innovate! exploring the current understanding of the swedish government’s call for innovation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(1), 34-49.
  24. Roberts-Gray, C., & Gray, T. (1983). The evaluation of text editors: Methodology and empirical results. Communications of the ACM, 26(4), 265-283.
  25. Santa, M. (2015). Learning organization review – a ‘good’ theory perspectiveâ€, The Learning Organization, 22(5), 242-270.
  26. Sianipar, C.P., & Yudoko, G. (2012). Understanding issue dissemination and arrival patterns on supply-chain using network analysis and social media. Journal of Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management, 2(3), 93-110.
  27. Sianipar, C.P. & Yudoko, G. (2014). Social media: toward an integrated human collaboration in supply-chain management. WIT Transactions on Information and Communication Technologies, 53, 249-266.
  28. Sugiyono. (2007). Statistik untuk Penelitian. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
  29. Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV Afabeta.
  30. Susanty, A.I., Salwa, M., Chandradini, A., Evanisa, F.W., & Iriani, N. (2016). Knowledge sharing and implementation of its enabling factors (a case study of three types of company in Indonesia). Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 24(S), 249-264.
  31. Susanty, A., Yuningsih, Y., & Anggadwita, G. (2019). Knowledge management practices and innovation performance: A study at Indonesian Government apparatus research and training center. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(2), 301-318.
  32. Tobing, P.L. (2007). Knowledge Management: Konsep, arsitektur dan implementasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  33. Tornatzky, L.G., & Klein, K.J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-45.