Comparison of clinical evaluation of post-operation patients of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) plating proximal humerus using conventional methods and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Surabaya
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Â
There are several kinds of approaches in the installation of implants for proximal humerus therapy. At present, minimally invasive surgery is gaining in popularity; this is supported by increasingly good technological developments to optimal the postoperative outcome is more optimal than conventional methods. This study used an analytic retrospective design with samples of post-ORIF Plating MIPO and posted ORIF due to proximal humeral fracture. Evaluation using the instrument of VAS Score, ASES Score, and measurement of range of motion. Statistical tests showed that there was a significant difference in the VAS score at the first evaluation (p = 0.002); the last review was not significant. In ASES Score, abduction, flexion, and external rotation, there were significant differences during the first and last evaluations. Adduction, extension, and internal rotation have no significance. The method of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) on proximal humeral operative fracture therapy had a better clinical outcome and operating time than post-ORIF plating with conventional methods. As well, the MIPO method on proximal humeral fracture operative therapy based on radiological features has the same union rates compared to post ORIF plating with conventional methods. The method of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in operative therapy of neer 2 and 3 proximal humeral fracture has a better clinical outcome than conventional methods.
Keywords: proximal humeral fracture, Minimal Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO), Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF)
Correspondence to: musa_shi911@yahoo.com
Â
ÂÂ
Full text article
References
Bucholz, R. W. et al. (2010). No Title, Rockwood And Green's Fractures In Adults. 7th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippicott Williams & Wilkins.
Esmailiejah AA, Abbasian MR, Safdari F, Ashoori K (2015). Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. Trauma Mon, 20(3).
Ismail, Boedijono, Hidayat H, Simbardjo DS. (2012). Minimal Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis ( MIPO ) Technique Using Anterolateral Approach for Treating Closed Proximal. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal, 6(1), 18–24.
Liu YW, Wei XE, Kuang Y, Zheng YX, Gu XF, Zhan HS, et al. (2016). Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies Open vs. Closed reduction combined with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in humeral fractures. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 25(4), 215–221.
Maier D, Jaeger M, Izadpanah K, Strohm PC, Suedkamp NP. (2014). Proximal Humeral Fracture Treatment in Adults. The Journal of bone and joint surgery, 96(3), 251–261.
Ruchholtz S, Hauk C, Lewan U, Franz D, Kuhne C, Zettl R. (2011). Minimally Invasive Polyaxial Locking Plate Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures : A Prospective Study. The Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 71(6), 1737–1744.
Shang LP, Zhou F, Ji HQ, Zhang ZS, Liu ZS, Tian Y. (2013). Comparison of curative effects between minimally invasive locking plate internal fixation and open reduction with internal fixation for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban., 45(5), 711–716.
Solomon, L., Nagayam, S. and Warwick, D. (2010) Apley's System Of Orthopedics and Fractures. 9th Edition. London: Hodder Arnold.
Thompson JC (2010). Netter's Concise Orthopaedic Anatomy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier.
Vochteloo AJH, Krekel PR. (2011). Range of motion implications of proximal humerus fractures : a case study. Eur Orthop Traumatol, 2, pp. 153–156.
Yu BF, Liu LL, Yang GJ, Zhang L, Lin Xp. (2016). Comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and conventional plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture. Medicine (United Kingdom), 95(39), pp. 1–5.
Zhou Z, Gao Y, Tang M. (2012). Minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis for proximal humeral shaft fractures with the PHILOS through the deltopectoral approach. International Orthopaedics (SICOT), 36, 2341–2345.
Authors
Qanun Medika by FK UM Surabaya is liscence under Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.