Mr Rusdianto



The purpose of research is to examine the impact of economic and noneconomic performance (environmental and social), information types, and personal value on manajer preference in evaluating project. The research employs experiment method for collecting data.

138 students of economic and business participated  in the study. The hypothesis assumes that manager in evaluating project considers environmental and social information, information types, and personal value on manager preference in decision making. The result finds that manager consider environmental and social information, but the result fails to show benefit of information  types.  Personal  values  is  partially  support.  The  result  strengtened  previous research about benefit of environmental and social information by  manager. The implication of the result is its role importance of management accounting for identifying environmental and social information as part of company strategy.

Keywords :  environmental  and  social  information,  economic information,  personal  value, stakeholder

Correspondence to       :



   Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menguji pengaruh informasi kinerja ekonomi dan nonekonomi (lingkungan dan sosial), bentuk-bentuk informasi lingkungan dan sosial, dan nilai personal pada preferensi keputusan manajer dalam evaluasi proyek. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen, mahasiswa ekonomika dan bisnis sebagai partisipan. 138 mahasiswa berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Hipotesis penelitian ini adalah bahwa manajer dalam mengevaluasi proyek bisnis mempertimbangkan informasi lingkungan dan sosial, mempertimbangkan bentuk informasi lingkungan dan sosial kuantitatif daripada kualitatif, dan nilai-nilai personal memengaruhi preferensi manajer dalam pengambilan keputusan. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa manajer mempertimbangkan informasi lingkungan dan sosial, tetapi gagal menunjukkan kebermanfaatan bentuk informasi kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Nilai personal terdukung sebagian dalam penelitian ini. Temuan pada penelitian ini memperkuat penelitian sebelumnya mengenai kebergunaan informasi lingkungan dan sosial dalam keputusan bisnis oleh pihak manajer internal. Implikasi lainnya adalah penekanan pada pentingnya  peran  akuntan  manajemen  dalam  mengidentifikasi  informasi  lingkungan  dan sosial sebagai bagian dari strategi perusahaan.

Kata kunci : informasi lingkungan dan sosial, informasi ekonomi, nilai personal, pemangku kepentingan.

Korespondensi :

Teks Lengkap:



Adams, C.A., dan Frost, G.R. (2008). Integrating Sustainability Reporting into Management

Practices. Accounting Forum. Vol. 32. 4:288-302.

Adams, R.B., Licht, A.N., dan Sagiv, Lilach. (2011). Shareholders and Stakeholders: How

Do Directors Decide. Strategic Management Journal. 32: 1331–1355.

Al-Tuwaijri, A.S., Christensen, T.E. dan Hughes, K.E. (2004). The Relations Among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance, And Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 29.


Anthony, R.N., dan Govindarajan, Vijay. (2007). Management Control System. Twelfth

Edition. McGraw-Hill.

Beets, S.D., dan Souther, C.C. (1999). Corporate Environmental Reports: The Need for

Standars and An Environmental Assurance Service. Accounting Horizons. Vol.13. 2:


Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S. dan Jones, T.M. (1999). Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models And Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 42. 5: 488-506.

Brockner, Joel. (1992). The Escalation Of Commitment to A Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 17. 1. 39-61.

Chan, C.C.C., dan Milne, M.J. (1999). Investor Reactions to Corporate Environmental Saints and Sinners: An Experimental Analysis. Accounting and Business Research. Vol. 29. 4:


Chong, V.K., dan Suryawati, R.F. (2010). De-Escalation Strategy: The Impact of Monitoring Control on Managers’ Project Evaluation Decisions. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research. Vol. 8. 2: 39-50.

Chong, V.K., dan Syarifuddin, Imran (2010). The Effect of Obedience Pressure and Authoritarianism on Managers’ Project Evaluation Decisions. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting. 26: 185-194.

Doinea, Ovidia., Lepadat, Gheorghe., Tomita, Vasile., dan Daniasa, Ionela. (2011). The Role of Accounting Information in Decision-Making Strategies and Processes. Economics, Management, and Financial Market. Vol. 6. 2: 1842-3191.

Donaldson, Thomas., dan Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of The Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 20.

: 65-91.

Flamholtz, Eric. G. (1979). The Process of Measurement in Managerial Accounting: A Psycho-Technical Systems Perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 5.

: 31-42.

Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman. Boston. MA. Freeman, R. Edward., dan Robert A. Philips. (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian

Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly. Vol. 12. 3: 331-349.

Ghozali, Imam. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 19.

Semarang: BP-UNDIP.

Graafland, J., & Van De Ven, B. (2012). Motives for Corporate Social Responsibility. De

Economist. 160: 377-396.

Gudono. (2014). Analisis Data Mulrivariat. Edisis 3. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Guidry, R.P., dan Patten, D.M. (2010). Market Reactions to the First-Time Issuance of Corporate Sustainability Reports: Evidence That Quality Matters. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. Vol. 1.1: 33-50.

Harrison, P.D., dan Harrell, Adrian. (1993). Impact of “Adverse Selection” On Managers’

Project Evaluation Decisions. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 36. 3:635-643.

Henri, J.F., dan Journeault, Marc. (2010). Eco-Control: The Influence Of Management Control Systems on Environmental And Economic Performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 35. 1:63-80

Huang, CL., dan Chang, B.G. (2010). The Effects of Managers’ Moral Philosophy on Project

Decision Under Agency Problem Condition. Journal of Business Ethics. 94:595-611.

Jones, T.M., Felps, W.A., dan Bigley, G.A. (2007). Ethical Theory and Stakeholder-Related

Decisions: The Role of Stakeholder Culture. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 32.

: 137–155.

Jones, T.M., dan Wicks, A.C. (1999). Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of

Management Review. Vol. 24. 2: 206-221.

Joshi, Satish., dan Krishman, Ranjani. (2010). Sustainability Accounting Systems with A Managerial Decision Focus. Cost Management. Vol. 24. 6: 20-30.

Kanodia, Chandra., Bushman, Robert., dan Dickhaut, John. (1989). Escalation Errors and The Sunk Cost Effect: An Explanation Based on Reputation and Information Asymmetries. Journal of Accounting Research. 27. 1: 59-77.

Keil, Mark., Mann, Joan., dan Rai, Arun. (2000). Why Software Projects Escalate: An

Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models. MIS Quarterly. Vol. 24. 4.


Larson, E.W., dan Gray, C.F. (2011). Project Management: The Managerial Process.

McGraw-Hill. Irwin, New York.

Madein, Afdal., dan Sholihin, Mahfud. (2015). The Impact of Social and Environmental

Information on Managers’ Decisions. Asia Review of Accounting. Vol. 23. 2:156-169.

Milne, M.J., dan Patten, D.M. (2002). Securing Organizational Legitimacy: An Experimental Decision Case Examining the Impact of Environmental Disclosures. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal. Vol. 15. 3: 372-405.

Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., dan Wood. D.J. (1997). Toward A Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review. Vol.22. 4: 853-886.

Nahartyo, Ertambang., dan Utami, Intiyas. (2016). Panduan Praktis Riset Eksperiment.

Indeks: Jakarta.

Oruc, Ilke., dan Sarikaya, Muammer. (2011). Normative Stakeholder Theory in Relation to

Ethics of Care. Social Responsibility Journal. Vol. 7. 3. 381-392.

Porter, M.E., dan Linde, C. (1995). Green and Competitive: Ending The Stalemate. Harvard

Business Review.

Rikhardsson, Pall., dan Holm, Claus. (2008). The Effect of Environmental Information on Investment Allocation Decisions – An Experimental Study. Business Strategy and the Environment. Vol. 17. 6.382-397.

Roth, H.P., dan Carl, E.K. (1997). Quality, Profits, and The Environment: Diverse Goals or Common Objectives. Is Your Company Lightgreen or Darkgreen. Management Accounting. Vol.79.1:51-55.

Rutledge, Robert., dan Karim, Khondkar. (1999). The Influence of Self-Interest and Ethical Considerations on Managers’ Evaluation Judgments. Accounting, Organizations, and Society. Vol.24. 2:172-184.

Schultz, P.W., Gouveia, V.V., Cameron, L.D., Tankha, Geetika., Schumuck, Peter., dan Franek, Marek. (2005). Value and Their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behaviour. Journal of Cross Cultural Pyshology. Vol. 36. 4: 457-475.

Schwartz, Shalom. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in The Structure and Contents of

Human Values?. Journal of Social Issues.Vol. 50. 4: 19-45.

Schwartz, S.H., Melech Gila., Lehmann,

Journal. 18: 303-317.

Arieile., Burgess, Steven., Harris, Mary., dan Owens, Vicky. (2001). Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of The Theory of Basic Human Values with A Different Method of Measurement. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology. Vol. 32. 5: 519–542.

Teoh, H.Y., dan Shiu, G.Y. (1990). Attitudes Towards Corporate Social Responsibility And Perceived Importance of Social Responsibility Information Characteristics in A Decision Context. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 9. 1: 71-77.

Tiwana, Amrit., Keil, Mark., dan Fichman, R.G. (2006). Information Systems Project

Continuation in Escalation Situations: A Real Option Model. Decision Sciences. Vol.


Trevino, L.K. (1986). Ethical Decisison Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation

Interactionist Model. Academic of Manegement Review. 11: 601-617.

Waddock, S.A., dan Graves, S. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial

Performance Link. Strategic Management


  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.