Metode Belajar Anatomi yang Menyenangkan bagi Mahasiswa Kedokteran

Bilah Samping Artikel

Diterbitkan Jun 2, 2026
https://doi.org/10.30651/ps.v5i1.31740
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Proceeding Series LSPID UMSURA

Isi Artikel Utama

Talitha Rahmania
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Farrel Maulana Adinatha
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Nurul Syafiqah
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Anisa Nabila
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Rengga Jaya Saputra
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Fathur Rosi
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Ardina Divayanti
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Tiara Anggie Kumala
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Hamida Alya Mukhbita
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Tania Siti Khalilah
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Salman Abdillah Susandi
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Kedokteran Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Maya Rahmayanti Syamhadi
Departemen Anatomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Abstrak

Pembelajaran anatomi dalam pendidikan kedokteran merupakan pondasi penting dalam membentuk kompetensi klinis mahasiswa, tetapi ada tantangan seperti metode konvensional berbasis hafalan, materi kompleks, beban kognitif tinggi, serta rendahnya keterlibatan dan motivasi mahasiswa. Literatur review ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji berbagai pendekatan pembelajaran anatomi yang efektif dan menyenangkan, serta faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kualitas proses dan hasil belajar mahasiswa. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelusuran dan analisis literatur ilmiah dari jurnal nasional dan internasional yang relevan. Dengan transformasi strategi pembelajaran yang lebih berpusat pada mahasiswa, aktif, fokus, dan senang. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan strategi pembelajaran aktif dan inovatif, seperti Active and Engaging Learning (AEL), gamifikasi, kuis interaktif, active recall, pembelajaran berbasis permainan, serta pemanfaatan teknologi visualisasi tiga dimensi (VR, AR, dan MR), dan juga metode konvensional seoerti diseksi kadaver. dilaporkan mampu meningkatkan keterlibatan, kesenangan, interaktif, kreativitas, serta pemahaman konsep anatomi. Meskipun metode inovatif tersebut tidak selalu menunjukkan peningkatan nilai ujian secara konsisten dibandingkan metode konvensional, pendekatan ini terbukti efektif sebagai pelengkap pembelajaran anatomi dalam pendidikan kedokteran.

Rincian Artikel

Referensi

  1. Burleson, K. M., & Olimpo, J. T. (2016). ClueConnect: a word array game to promote student comprehension of key terminology in an introductory anatomy and physiology course. Advances in physiology education, 40(2), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00106.2015
  2. Cale, A. S., & McNulty, M. A. (2025). Chaotic fun! Promoting active recall of anatomical structures and relationships using the Catch-Phrase game. Anatomical sciences education, 18(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2549
  3. Chang Chan, A. Y. C., van Leeuwen, M., Custers, E., Bleys, R., & Ten Cate, O. (2025). Anatomy education in low-resourced countries: What are challenges and effective and affordable educational strategies? A qualitative study. Medical teacher, 47(5), 883–
  4. 893. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2383373
  5. Du, Y. C., Fan, S. C., & Yang, L. C. (2020). The impact of multi-person virtual reality competitive
  6. learning on anatomy education: a randomized controlled study. BMC medical education, 20(1), 343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02155-9
  7. García-Robles, P., Cortés-Pérez, I., Nieto-Escámez, F. A., García-López, H., Obrero-Gaitán, E., & Osuna-Pérez, M. C. (2024). Immersive virtual reality and augmented reality in anatomy education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anatomical sciences education, 17(3), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2397
  8. Goubar, T., Larach, J., Hindmarch, J., Bownes, S., & Sinha, S. (2021). A pragmatic approach to effective anatomy teaching and learning to medical students: a ten-year experience using evidence-based principles. MedEdPublish, 10(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2021.000147.1
  9. Haładaj R. (2019). Normal Anatomy and Anomalies of the Rectus Extraocular Muscles in Human:
  10. A Review of the Recent Data and Findings. BioMed research international, 2019, 8909162. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8909162
  11. Holan, G., Asri, R., Yadav, A., Traba, C., Chen, S., & Grachan, J. J. (2025). Escape Room Activity
  12. to Teach Head and Neck Anatomy. MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 21, 11494. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11494 Krishnamurthy, K., Selvaraj, N., Gupta, P., Cyriac, B., Dhurairaj, P., Abdullah, A., Krishnapillai, A., Lugova, H., Haque, M., Xie, S., & Ang, E. T. (2022). Benefits of gamification in medical education. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 35(6), 795–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23916
  13. Kopel, J., Brower, G., & Culberson, J. W. (2021). Teaching methods fostering enjoyment and creativity in medical education. Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 11(6), 821–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2021.1979739
  14. Lazarus, L., Sookrajh, R., & Satyapal, K. S. (2019). Perceptions of South African academic instructors toward the teaching and learning of anatomy. Folia morphologica, 78(4), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2019.0034
  15. Minouei, M. A., Omid, A., Mirzaie, A., Mahdavifard, H., & Rahimi, A. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual reality on medical students' academic achievement in anatomy: systematic review. BMC medical education, 24(1), 1407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s1290902406402-1
  16. Mori, S., Tretter, J. T., Spicer, D. E., Bolender, D. L., & Anderson, R. H. (2019). What is the real cardiac anatomy?. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 32(3), 288– 309. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23340
  17. Mugagga, K., Mwarisi, M. G., & Dare, S. S. (2020). The Wooden Skull: An Innovation through
  18. the Use of Local Materials and Technology to Promote the Teaching and Learning of
  19. Human Anatomy. BioMed research international, 2020, 8036737. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8036737
  20. Uruthiralingam, U., & Rea, P. M. (2020). Augmented and Virtual Reality in Anatomical
  21. Education - A Systematic Review. Advances in experimental medicine and biology,
  22. 1235, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_5
  23. Singh, K., Bharatha, A., Sa, B., Adams, O. P., & Majumder, M. A. A. (2019). Teaching anatomy using an active and engaging learning strategy. BMC medical education, 19(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1590-2
  24. Stiver, M. L., Naveed, A., Chilton, J., & Moyes, S. M. (2025). Gamifying anatomy outreach: An underexplored opportunity. Anatomical Sciences Education, 18(12), 1359–1372. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70019
  25. Tello-Mendoza, R., Alvarez-Lozada, L. A., Guzman-Lopez, S., Quiroga-Garza, A.,
  26. SalinasAlvarez, Y., Elizondo-Omana, R. E., & Morton, D. A. (2025). The paper puzzle
  27. as an active learning tool in the teaching of anatomy: A qualitative study of perceptions in students and near-peer teachers. Anatomical
  28. Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70112
  29. Verma, A., Pasricha, N., Chaudhary, A., Bhatnagar, R., Sthapak, E., & Gaharwar, A. (2024).
  30. Interactive Quiz-Based Anatomy Teaching for Medical Undergraduate Students. Cureus, 16(1), e52353. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.52353
  31. Vieno-Corbett, K., Campbell, N., Pecyna, A. and Rogers, K.A. (2025). A scoping review of teaching approaches and learning objectives for anatomical variation in gross anatomy courses across degree programs. Anatomical Sciences Education, 18(9), pp. 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70072
  32. Wang, J., Li, W., Dun, A., Zhong, N., & Ye, Z. (2024). 3D visualization technology for Learning human anatomy among medical students and residents: a meta- and regression analysis. BMC medical education, 24(1), 461. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05403-4