Integritas Auditor Sebagai Pemoderasi : Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Kompleksitas Tugas Dan Audit Time Budget, Terhadap Kualitas Audit: (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Dan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Perwakilan Sumatera Selatan Di Kota Palembang)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30651/blc.v15i01.1263Abstrak
ABSTRACTÂ
The purpose of this study was to find out the influence of competence, independence, audit time budget,,task complexity on the audit quality and to find out the auditor integrity as a moderating influence of competence on the audit quality, the auditor integrity as a moderating influence of independence on the audit quality, the auditor integrity as the moderating influence of the task complexity on the audit quality. This study used associative research. The data were primary data and secondary data. The popolation of this research was auditors who work in KAP and BPK RI in Palembang, there were 124 respondents. The techniques used for collecting the data were interviews, questionnaires and documentation. The techniques used for analyzing the data ware quantitative and qualitative analysis. The results showed that the competence gave a significantl effect on audit quality, independenceand audit time budget  gave a significant effect on audit quality, the task complexity has no effect on audit quality. Integrity of the auditor is not able to moderate the influence of competence to audit quality, independence and audit time budget gave significant effect on audit quality that moderated the auditor integrity, and the task complexity gave significant effect on audit quality that moderated the auditor integrity.
Keywords                  : Factors affecting audit quality
Correspondence to     : betri.sirajuddin@gmail.com
Â
ABSTRAKÂ
Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, kompleksitas tugas dan anggaran waktu audit terhadap kualitas audit serta untuk mengetahui integritas auditor sebagai pemoderasi terhadap kualitas audit. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian asosiatif. Data yang digunakan yaitu data primer dan data sekunder. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah auditor yang tersebar dan bekerja di KAP dan BPK RI Palembang sebanyak 124 responden. Teknik pengumpulan data yaitu dengan menggunakan wawancara, kuesioner dan dokumentasi . Metode analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis kuantitatif dan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kompetensi independensi serta anggaran waktu audit secara signifikan memengaruhi kualitas audit, sedangkan kompleksitas tugas tidak memengaruhi kualtitas audit. Intergritas auditor tidak mampu memoderasi pengaruh kompetensi terhadap kualitas audit, independensi dan anggran waktu audit secara signifikan memengaruhi kualitas audit yang dimoderasi integritas auditor, dan kompleksitas tugas secara signifikan memengaruhi kualitas audit yang dimoderasi integritas auditor.
Kata kunci                : Kualitas Audit
Korespodensi           : betri.sirajuddin@gmail.com
Referensi
A.A Putu Ratih Cahaya Ningsih dan P. Dyan Yaniartha S. 2013. Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Time Budget Pressure terhadap Kualitas Audit.E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. Vol 4.1, h. 92-109. ISSN: 2302-8556.
Alderman, C.W. and Deitrick, J.W. (1982), “Auditors’ perceptions of time budget pressures and premature sign-offs: a replication and extensionâ€, Auditing: A Journal of Practice&Theory, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 54- 68.
Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C. and Robson, K. (2001), “Tests of time: organizational time reckoning and the making of accountants in two multi-national accounting firmsâ€, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 99-122.
Arnlod, V., S. G. Sutton, S. C. Hayne, and C. A. P Smith. 2000. Group Decision Making: The Impact of Opportunity Cost Time Pressure and Group Support Systems. Behavioral Research in Accounting. Vol. 12: 69-97
Ashbaugh, H. 2004. Ethical Issues Related to the Provision of Audit and Non-audit Services: Evidence from Academic Research. Journal of Business Ethics. (June): 143-148.
Beattie, V., R. Brandt, and S. Fearnley. 1999. Perceptions of Auditor Independence: UK Evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation. Vol. 8. Number 1: 67-107.
Bhinga Primaraharjo dan Jesica Handoko. 2011. Pengaruh Kode Etik Profesi Akuntan Publik Terhadap Kualitas Audit Auditor Independen di Surabaya. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer. Vol.3.1, h.27-51.
Boatham, S. and P. Ussahawanitchakit. 2009. Audit Independence, Quality, and Credibility: Effects on Reputation and Sustainable Success of CPAs in Thailand. International Journal of Business Research. Volume 9. Number 1: 1-26
Colbert, J. L. 1989. The Effect of Experience Auditor's Judgements. Journal of Accounting Literature. 8: 137-149
Deal, T.E. and Kennedy, A.A. (1982), Corporate Cultures, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor Size and Auditor Quality. Journal of Accounting & Economics. (Dec.) 3: 183-199.
Deis, D. R. and G. A. Giroux. 1992. Determinants of Audit Quality in the Public Sector. The Accounting Review. Vol. 67. Number 3: 462-479.
DeZoort, F. T. 1998. Time Pressure Research in Auditing Implication for Practice. The Auditor’s Report. 22. No. 1 (Fall): 1-5
Diani Mardisar dan Ria Nelly Sari. 2007. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas dan Pengetahuan Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Kerja Auditor. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X Unhas Makassar 26-28 Juli 2007.
Dikolli, S. S., S. A. McCracken, and J. B. Walawski. 2004. Audit-Planning Judgments and Client-Employee Compensation Contracts. Behavioral Research in Accounting. Sarasota Vol. 16: 45-62
Duff, A. 2004. Auditqual: Dimensions of Audit Quality. Published by: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sacotland. http://www.ssrn.com
Ford, R.C. and Richardson, W.D. (1994), “Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literatureâ€, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 205-221. Francis, J., (2004), “What do we know about audit qualityâ€, The British Accounting Review, Vol 36, pp. 345-368.
Fritzsche, D.J. (1991), “A model of decision-making incorporating ethical valuesâ€, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 10 No. 11, pp. 841-852.
Gumanti, T. A. 2003. Motivasi Dibalik Earning Management. http//:korantempo.com
Hasbullah, Ni Luh Gede Erni Sulindawati, Nyoman Trisna Herawati. 2014. Pengaruh Keahlian Audit, Kompleksitas Tugas, dan Etika Profesi terhadap Kualitas Audit. E-Journal S1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Vol. 2 Nomor 1.
Hussey, R. and G. Lan. 2001. An Examination of Auditor Independence Issues from the Perspectives of U.K. Finance Directors. Journal of Business Ethics, (Springer). Vol. 32. No. 2: 169-178
I Gusti Agung dan I D.G. Dharma. 2016. Integritas sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor Pada Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. Vol.16.3, h. 1744-1770.
IAI Kompartemen Akuntan Publik. 2001. PSAP. Jakarta. Salemba Empat.Independensi terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Etika Auditor Sebagai Variabel Moderasi.
Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. 2011. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Jaffar, N., S. M. Ali, Z. B. Selamat, and N. Alias. 2005. The Perception of the Audit Partners, Audit Committee and Investment Analyst on the Audit Quality Attributes in Malaysian. Finance India. (June). Vol. 19. Iss. 2: 535-546
Jawa Pos, 20 September 2005. 14 Auditor BPK Dijatuhi Sanksi (online) (http://www.antikorupsi.org/en/content/14-auditor-bpk-dijatuhi-sanksi, diakses 15 maret 2017).
Lasmahadi, A. 2002. Sistem Manajemen SDM Berbasis Kompetensi. http//:www.e-psikologi.com
Lauw Tjun Tjun, Elyzabet Indrawati Marpaung, dan Santy Setiawan. 2012. Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi. Vol. 4 Nomor 1, h. 33-56.
Lee, T. A. and M. Stone. 1995. Competence and Independence: the Uncongenial Twins of Auditing?. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting: 1169-1177.
Lili M Sadeli. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Akuntansi. Cetakan Kelima. Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara.
Luh Winda Asri Ayuni dan Bambang Suprasto H. 2016. Integritas Auditor Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Kompleksitas Tugas terhadap Kualitas Audi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. Vol.15.3, h. 2352-2377.
MacMillan, K., K. Money, S. Downing, and C. Hillenbrand. 2004. Giving your Organisation SPIRIT: An Overview and Call to Action for Directors on Issues of Corporate Governance, Coporate Reputation and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of General Management. Vol. 30: 15-42.
Malone, C. F. and R. W. Roberts. 1996. Factors Associated with the Incidence of Reduced Audit Quality Behaviors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 14: 39-46
Mann, L. and C. Tan. 1993. The Hassled Decision Maker: The Effects of Perceived Time Pressure on Information Processing in Decision Making. Australian Journal of Management. 18 (2): 197-210.
Mathius Tandiontong. 2016. Kualitas Audit dan Pengukurannya. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
McNair, C.J. (1991), “Proper compromises: the management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behaviorâ€, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 635-653.
Messier, William F, Steven M. Glover, & Douglas F. Prawitt. 2006. Auditing Services & Assurance. Alih Bahasa Nuri Hiduan. Buku 1. Edisi 4. Jakarta: Salemba Empat Mulyadi. 2013. Auditing. Buku 1. Edisi 6. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Mojtahedzadeh, V. and P. Aghaei. 2005. Factors Affecting on Independent Audit Quality: From the ViewPoint of Auditors and Users. The Iranian Accounting and Auditing Review. Vol.11. Number. 38: 53-76.
Norma Kharismatuti, P Basuki Hadiprajitno. 2012. Pengaruh Kompetensi dan
Oklivia dan Aan Marlinah. 2014. Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Faktor-Faktor Dalam Diri Auditor Lainnya terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. Vol.16 Nomor 2, h. 143-157.
Perry, L. 1984. The SEC's Enforcement Activities. The CPA Journal. Vol. 54. Number 4: 9-13
Ponemon, L.A. (1992), “Auditor underreporting of time and moral reasoning: an experimental lab studyâ€, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 171-211. JIEB-4-2016 12
Power, M. (2003), “Auditing and the production of legitimacyâ€, Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 379-394.
Randal J. Elder, Mark S Beasley, Alvin A Arens, Amir Abadi Jusuf. 2013. Jasa Audit dan Assurance. Alih Bahasa Desti Fitriani. Buku 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Schroeder, M. S., I. Salomon, and D. W. Vikrey. 1986. Audit Quality: The Perception of Audit Committee Chairperson and Audit Partners. Auditing: A Journal of Practise & Theory, Spring: 77-92
Singgih Santoso. 2012. Analisis SPSS Pada Statistik Parametrik. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputer Indo.
Siti Jamilah dan Zaenal Fanani. 2007. Pengaruh Gender, Tekanan Ketaatan, dan Kompleksitas Tugas Terhadap Audit Judgment. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X. Makassar.1-18
Soeratin, H. Z. 2010. Kantor Akuntan Publik Dibekukan. http//:www.depkeu.go.id.
Sridharan, U. V., W. R. Caines, J. McMillan, and S. Summers. 2002. Financial Statement Transparency and Auditor Responsibility: Enron and Andersen. International Journal of Auditing. Vol. 6: 277-286.
Sugiyono. 2013a. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2014b. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta. Sukrisno Agoes. 2012. Auditing Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan Oleh Akuntan Publik. Jilid 1. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Sukrisno Agoes dan I Cenik Ardana. 2014. Etika Bisnis dan Profesi. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Sunjono, Roni Setiawan, Verani Carolina, Nonie Magdalena, Albert Kurniawan. 2013. Aplikasi SPSS untuk Smart Riset (ProgramIBM SPSS 21.0). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryanita Weningtyas, Doddy Setiawan, dan Hanung Triatmoko. 2007. Penghentian Prematur atas Prosedur Audit. SimposiumNasional Akuntansi. Padang.
Tan, H. and R. Libby. 1997. Tacit Managerial Versus Technical Knowledge as Determinants of Audit Expertise in the Field. Journal of Accounting Research. Vol. 35: 97-113.
Undang-Undang Repulik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. 2006. Jakarta: Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan.
V. Wiratna Sujarweni. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis & Ekonomi. Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Baru Press.
Warming, R. B. and L. Jensen. 2001. Quality Dimensions In External Audit Services An External User Perspective. European Accounting Review, Vol. 7 (1): 1-15.
Watkins, A. J., W. Hillison, and S. E. Morecroft. 2004. Audit Quality: A Synthetis Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature. Vol. 23: 153-194.
Widiarta. 2013. Pengaruh Gender, Umur, dan Kompeksitas Tugas Auditor pada Kualitas Audit Kantor Akuntan Publik di Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 3.1,h. 109-118. ISSN: 2302-8556.
Wooten, T. C. 2003. Research about Audit Quality. The CPA Journal. (Jan.). Vol. 71. Iss. 1: 48-52
Yuli Pitaloka dan A.A.G.P. Widanaputra. 2016. Integritas Auditor Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi pada Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. Vol. 16.2, h. 1574-1603.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta
- Hak cipta terhadap artikel yang diterbitkan di BALANCE: Economic, Business, Management, and Accounting Journal adalah penerbit atau BALANCE: Economic, Business, Management, and Accounting Journal.
- Penulis harus menyerahkan hak cipta pada jurnal dengan menandatangai dan mengirimkan form penyerahan hak cipta (template) melalui email balance@um-surabaya.ac.id.
- Penulis dapat menyebarluaskan artikelnya melalui media manapun.
Lisensi
Setiap karya yang ditulis penulis dilisensi dengan Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
