Bahasa Tiktokers Paksel pada Akun Tiktok @raflychaniag0: Kajian Sosiolinguistik

Nanda Tri Subehi (1), Prembayun Miji Lestari (2)
(1) Sastra Jawa, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia,
(2) Sastra Jawa, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Abstrak

ABSTRAK


Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan variasi bahasa dan karakteristik bahasa pada konten di akun TikTok @raflychaniago menggunakan kajian sosiolinguistik teori variasi bahasa Chaer dan Agustina sebagai teori utama. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif kualitatif. Data dan sumber data berupa ujaran lisan penutur yang mengandung kata, frasa, kalimat, maupun wacana pada empat konten video di akun TikTok @raflychaniago. Teknik pengumpulan data, yakni teknik simak bebas libat cakap dan teknik lanjutan catat. Teknik analisis data menggunakan model analisis data Miles dan Huberman, yakni peneliti mengumpulkan data, mereduksi data, menyajikan data,  menarik kesimpulan, lalu memverifikasi. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh yakni ditemukan tiga variasi bahasa yakni dari segi penutur terdiri dari 35 data idiolek; dialek berupa dialek Ngapak; 3 data kronolek; dan 3 jenis sosiolek, segi keformalan yang berupa ragam santai, dan segi sarana berupa ragam bahasa lisan. Peneliti juga menemukan enam karakteristik bahasa Rafly pada konten TikToknya.


Kata kunci: Variasi bahasa, tiktok, sosiolinguistik, paksel


 


ABSTRACT


This study aims to explore the function of language in the traditional rituals of the Osing tribe. This study used a qualitative approach with ethnographic communication methods, participant observation techniques, and in-depth interviews with 20 children and traditional leaders. Data were collected through audiovisual recordings of children's interactions during traditional rituals, field notes, and interviews. Data analysis was conducted using Searle's (1969) pragmatic theory framework. The results showed that children were able to identify and interpret various language functions in traditional rituals, such as declarative, expressive, and directive functions. Other findings revealed a scaffolding process by adults in facilitating children's understanding of the pragmatic aspects of ritual language. This study contributes to an in-depth understanding of the role of traditional rituals in the pragmatic development of early childhood and highlights the importance of preserving local wisdom as a rich source of language learning. Practical implications of this study include recommendations for integrating elements of traditional rituals into early childhood education curricula to support the development of their pragmatic competence.


Keyword: Language variations, tiktok, sociolinguistic, paksel

Artikel teks lengkap

##article.generated_from_xml##

Referensi

Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts. Educational Psychology, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134

Crystal, D. (2000). Language Death. Cambridge University Press.

Duranti, A. (2018). The Anthropology of Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

García-Sánchez, I. M. (2020). Language, Ritual, and Identity Formation in Migrant Children: A Sociocultural Perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 49(2), 151–166.

Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. (2020). Language and Learning in the Digital Age: Socialization and Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1078/tgh.012.2020.1410019

Hymes, D. (1974). oundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Hymes, D. (2015). On communicative competence (Ed. VI). Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, 26(2), 269–293.

Kendall, T., & Call, N. A. (2021). Children’s Pragmatic Language Use in Religious and Social Rituals: A Comparative Urban Study. Language in Society, 50(3), 321–340.

Lailiyah, N., & Agan, S. (2022). Analisis Verbal Dan Nonverbal Pada Mantra Pengobatan Sebagai Media Penyembuhan Di Masyarakat Kediri : Kajian Etnolinguistik. Jurnal Tradisi Lisan Nusantara, 2(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.51817/jsl.v1i1.142

Levinson, S. C. (2008). Pragmatics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.

Mills, H., & Simpson, J. (2022). Pragmatics in Child Language Development: Cultural and Social Influences. Cambridge University Press.

Moore, R. E. (2019). Language and Identity in Indigenous Communities: Symbolism and Pragmatics. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 29(1), 45–60.

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2011). The Theory of Language Socialization. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.). The Handbook of Language Socialization, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901.ch1

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2016). The theory of language socialization. The handbook of language socialization.

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2017). Language socialization: An historical overview. In P. A. Duff & S. May (Eds.) Language Socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (3rd Ed 2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_6

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2021). Language Socialization Across Cultures. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

Susetyarini, E., & Kurniawati, D. (2022). Creative teaching can improve collaborative, critical thinking, creative thinking, and communication skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2).

Widianto, A., & Arifin, Z. (2020). Bahasa dan Tradisi Lisan dalam Masyarakat Jawa: Sebuah Kajian Antropologi Linguistik. Pustaka Jaya.

Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts. Educational Psychology, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134

Crystal, D. (2000). Language Death. Cambridge University Press.

Duranti, A. (2018). The Anthropology of Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

García-Sánchez, I. M. (2020). Language, Ritual, and Identity Formation in Migrant Children: A Sociocultural Perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 49(2), 151–166.

Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. (2020). Language and Learning in the Digital Age: Socialization and Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1078/tgh.012.2020.1410019

Hymes, D. (1974). oundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Hymes, D. (2015). On communicative competence (Ed. VI). Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, 26(2), 269–293.

Kendall, T., & Call, N. A. (2021). Children’s Pragmatic Language Use in Religious and Social Rituals: A Comparative Urban Study. Language in Society, 50(3), 321–340.

Lailiyah, N., & Agan, S. (2022). Analisis Verbal Dan Nonverbal Pada Mantra Pengobatan Sebagai Media Penyembuhan Di Masyarakat Kediri : Kajian Etnolinguistik. Jurnal Tradisi Lisan Nusantara, 2(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.51817/jsl.v1i1.142

Levinson, S. C. (2008). Pragmatics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.

Mills, H., & Simpson, J. (2022). Pragmatics in Child Language Development: Cultural and Social Influences. Cambridge University Press.

Moore, R. E. (2019). Language and Identity in Indigenous Communities: Symbolism and Pragmatics. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 29(1), 45–60.

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2011). The Theory of Language Socialization. In A. Duranti, E. Ochs, & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.). The Handbook of Language Socialization, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901.ch1

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2016). The theory of language socialization. The handbook of language socialization.

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2017). Language socialization: An historical overview. In P. A. Duff & S. May (Eds.) Language Socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (3rd Ed 2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_6

Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2021). Language Socialization Across Cultures. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

Susetyarini, E., & Kurniawati, D. (2022). Creative teaching can improve collaborative, critical thinking, creative thinking, and communication skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2).

Widianto, A., & Arifin, Z. (2020). Bahasa dan Tradisi Lisan dalam Masyarakat Jawa: Sebuah Kajian Antropologi Linguistik. Pustaka Jaya.

Penulis

Nanda Tri Subehi
nandatriskj@students.unnes.ac.id (Kontak utama)
Prembayun Miji Lestari
Subehi, N. T., & Lestari, P. M. (2025). Bahasa Tiktokers Paksel pada Akun Tiktok @raflychaniag0: Kajian Sosiolinguistik. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 18(2), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.30651/st.v18i2.26365

Rincian Artikel

No Related Submission Found