HOW PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS SHAPE USER TRUST IN AI ACROSS DIFFERENT APPLICATION DOMAINS
Abstrak
User trust in artificial intelligence (AI) is shaped by a complex interaction of cognitive and experiential factors, yet empirical evidence on how these psychological determinants jointly predict trust remains limited. This study investigates a multi-factor psychological model of user trust using secondary data from 6,678 participants interacting with various AI systems. Five predictors—cognitive load, trust history, prior AI exposure, time pressure, and cultural factors—were examined using correlational and multiple regression analyses. The results show that trust history is the strongest positive predictor of user trust (β = .485, p < .001), while cognitive load significantly reduces trust (β = –.151, p < .001). Other variables did not exhibit significant effects. The model explains 25.7% of the variance in latent trust scores, demonstrating meaningful predictive power for psychological factors alone. These findings highlight the central role of cognitive ease and positive experiential familiarity in shaping trust in AI. The study contributes to Human–AI Interaction research by clarifying which psychological processes most strongly influence trust and by offering implications for designing AI systems that foster reliable, low-friction user experiences.
Artikel teks lengkap
Referensi
Afroogh, S., Akbari, A., Malone, E., Kargar, M., & Alambeigi, H. (2024). Trust in AI: progress, challenges, and future directions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04044-8
Alasmari, A. A., Alruwaili, R. F., Alotaibi, R. F., Youssef, I. K., & Asklany, S. A. (2025). Demographic influences on trust in artificial intelligence across cognitive domains: A statistical perspective. Plos One, 20(11 November). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331003
Bach, T. A., Khan, A., Hallock, H., Beltrão, G., & Sousa, S. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(5), 1251–1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2138826
Bellini-Leite, S. C. (2022). Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic and Classical. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(March), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.805386
David, K., Geihs, K., Leimeister, J. M., Roßnagel, A., Schmidt, L., Stumme, G., & Wacker, A. (2014). Socio-technical design of ubiquitous computing systems. Socio-Technical Design of Ubiquitous Computing Systems, 1–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05044-7
De Freitas, J., Agarwal, S., Schmitt, B., & Haslam, N. (2023). Psychological Factors Underlying Attitudes Toward AI Tools. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(11), 1845–1854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01734-2
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
Han, J., & Ko, D. (2025). Trust Formation, Error Impact, and Repair in Human–AI Financial Advisory: A Dynamic Behavioral Analysis. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101370
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254
Islam, K. F., Awal, A., Mazumder, H., Munni, U. R., Majumder, K., Afroz, K., Tabassum, M. N., & Hossain, M. M. (2023). Social cognitive theory-based health promotion in primary care practice: A scoping review. Heliyon, 9(4), e14889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14889
Jiang, W., Li, D., & Liu, C. (2025). Understanding Dimensions of Trust in AI Through Quantitative Cognition: Implications for Human-AI Collaboration. Plos One, 20(7 July), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326558
Kroeger, F. (2019). Unlocking the treasure trove: How can Luhmann’s theory of trust enrich trust research? Journal of Trust Research, 9(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1552592
Li, Y., Wu, B., Huang, Y., & Luan, S. (2024). Developing trustworthy artificial intelligence: insights from research on interpersonal, human-automation, and human-AI trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(April), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382693
Malik, E. (2025). Human-AI Interaction [Data set]. Kaggle. https://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/dsv/13207192
Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Marrone, R., Korolkiewicz, M., Gabriel, F., Siemens, G., Joksimovic, S., Yamada, Y., Mori, Y., Rahwan, T., Sahakyan, M., Sonna, B., Meirmanov, A., Bolatov, A., Som, B., Ndukaihe, I., Arinze, N. C., Kundrát, J., Skanderová, L., Ngo, V. G., … Tejada, J. (2024). Factors influencing trust in algorithmic decision-making: an indirect scenario-based experiment. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1465605
Mayer, R. C., David, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of ORganizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.3390/g13030039
McGrath, M. J., Lack, O., Tisch, J., & Duenser, A. (2025). Measuring Trust In Artificial Intelligence: Validation Of An Established Scale And Its Short Form. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1582880
Mehrotra, S., Degachi, C., Vereschak, O., Jonker, C. M., & Tielman, M. L. (2024). A Systematic Review on Fostering Appropriate Trust in Human-AI Interaction: Trends, Opportunities and Challenges. ACM Journal on Responsible Computing, 1(4), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696449
Merritt, S. M., Lee, D., Unnerstall, J. L., & Huber, K. (2015). Are Well-Calibrated Users Effective Users? Associations Between Calibration of Trust and Performance on an Automation-Aided Task. Human Factors, 57(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814561675
Mylrea, M., & Robinson, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Trust Framework and Maturity Model: Applying an Entropy Lens to Improve Security, Privacy, and Ethical AI. Entropy, 25(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/e25101429
Nugraha, I., & Fatwanto, A. (2021). User Experience Design Practices in Industry (Case Study from Indonesian Information Technology Companies). Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education), 6(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v6i1.40958
Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2020). Cognitive-Load Theory: Methods to Manage Working Memory Load in the Learning of Complex Tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183
Pham, V. K., Pham Thi, T. D., & Duong, N. T. (2024). A Study on Information Search Behavior Using AI-Powered Engines: Evidence From Chatbots on Online Shopping Platforms. SAGE Open, 14(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241300007
Samson, K., & Kostyszyn, P. (2015). Effects of cognitive load on trusting behavior - An experiment using the trust game. PLoS ONE, 10(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127680
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theroy. In Intstructional Systems and PErformance Technologues (Vol. 82, Issue 1).
Yang, R., Li, S., Qi, Y., Liu, J., He, Q., & Zhao, H. (2024). Deciphering the Dynamics of Algorithm Trust: The Role of Task Objectivity, Time Pressure, and Cognitive Load. SSRN Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4931387
Yang, R., Li, S., Qi, Y., Liu, J., He, Q., & Zhao, H. (2025). Unveiling users’ algorithm trust: The role of task objectivity, time pressure, and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18(April), 100667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100667
Zhou, J., Li, Z., Yu, K., Chen, F., Wang, Y., Hu, H., & Li, Z. (2019). Effects of influence on user trust in predictive decision making. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312962
Penulis
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Putu Dhanu Driya, Ni Putu Abigail Firsta Sumerta; Made Sunanda Ayu Sandrina

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Copyright
Authors who publish their manuscripts in Archetype: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi dan Terapan agree to the following terms and conditions:
- Authors retain copyright over their work and grant the journal the right of first publication, where the work is licensed under a Creative Commons license. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC).
- Authors are permitted to upload articles that have been published (Post-Print or Publisher's PDF versions) to institutional repositories, personal websites, or other media with full attribution and without commercial use.
- Licensing Policy
All content published in Archetype: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi dan Terapan Full Open Access and licensed under:
Lisensi Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY - NC 4.0)

This license permits users to:
- Share : Copying and distributing the material in any media or format.
- Adapt : Remix, modify, and build upon this material.
Provided that users must meet two main requirements:
- BY – Attribution : Users must attribute the work appropriately (credit) and provide a link to the license, as well as indicate if any changes have been made. This must be done in a reasonable manner without implying that the publisher or author endorses you or your use.
- NC – NonCommercial : Users are not permitted to use this material for commercial purposes.
What is meant by Non-Commercial?
Use intended for commercial gain or personal monetary compensation. Use of this journal content must be for educational, research, or non-profit purposes.
Important: This license aims to maximize the dissemination of research while protecting authors' rights from commercial exploitation.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, Authors retain copyright and grant the Archetype : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi dan Terapan and Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya as publisher of first publication right.