THE DESCRIPTION OF ACADEMIC BOREDOM AMONG FEMALE STUDENTS AT PONDOK PESANTREN PUTRI X
Artikel Sidebar
Abstrak
Pondok pesantren merupakan sebuah kawasan yang memiliki sub-kultur tersendiri yang secara garis besar terbagi dalam tiga jenis yakni salafiyah (tradisional), khalafiyah (modern), dan terpadu. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada santri pondok pesantren X yang berjenis pondok pesantren salafiyah (tradisional). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui adanya kebosanan akademik atau academic boredom yang dipicu oleh aktivitas keseharian dengan jadwal padat, monoton, dan lingkungan yang itu-itu saja memicu timbulnya rasa bosan dan letih. Penelitian ini menggunakan 206 sampel dari 206 santri kelas 3 MTS. Teknik sampling menggunakan sampling jenuh dengan alat ukur The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Analisa data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah deskriptif menggunakan microsoft excel. Berdasarkan keseluruhan data yang telah diperoleh, santri kelas 3 Mts di pondok pesantren putri X mengalami kebosanan akademik pada kategori sedang dengan nilai 63%, kategori rendah 19% dan kategori tinggi yaitu sebesar 18%.
Artikel teks lengkap
Referensi
[1] M. S. Zuhriy, “Budaya Pesantren Dan Pendidikan Karakter Pada Pondok Pesantren Salaf,” Walisongo J. Penelit. Sos. Keagamaan, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 287, 2011, doi: 10.21580/ws.2011.19.2.159.
[2] A. Z. Mubarok, “Model Pendidikan Pesantren Terpadu Dalam Membina Karakter Di Era Globalisasi,” Quality, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 191–204, 2019, doi: 10.21043/quality.v7i1.4832.
[3] Y. Aulia, I. D. Kumala, S. Faradina, and A. Sulistyani, “Mindfulness dan Boredom pada Mahasiswa yang mengikuti Kuliah Dalam Jaringan ( Daring ) ( Mindfulness and Boredom on University Students Who Learn through Online Class ),” J. Ilm. Psikol. Mind Set, vol. 14, no. 2, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.35814/mindset.v14i02.3895
[4] S. R. Herawan et al., “Pengaruh Pelatihan Goal Setting Dalam Mengatasi Academic Boredom di Remaja Sidodadi Surabaya,” Psychopreneur J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 86–93, 2023, doi: 10.37715/psy.v6i2.3219.
[5] M. Finkielsztein, “Class-related academic boredom among university students: a qualitative research on boredom coping strategies,” J. Furth. High. Educ., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1098–1113, 2020, doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2019.1658729.
[6] T. Goetz, L. Stempfer, R. Pekrun, W. A. P. Van Tilburg, and A. A. Lipnevich, “Academic Boredom,” Routledge Int. Handb. Boredom, pp. 225–249, 2024, doi: 10.4324/9781003271536-18.
[7] N. A. Ambarwati, “Kejenuhan Belajar dan Cara Mengatasinya,” J. Psikol. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2020.
[8] G. Affandi, C. Hadi, and N. A. Nawangsari, “Academic Boredom in School Context: A Systematic Scoping Review,” no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.4108/eai.18-7-2023.2343413.
[9] L. Robertson, “International handbook of emotions in education,” Educ. Psychol. Pract., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 107–109, 2015, doi: 10.1080/02667363.2014.994350.
[10] R. Larson and M. Richardz, “boredom in the middle school years : blaming schools versus blaming students,” Am. J. Educ., 1991.
[11] N. Hativa, “the impact of intructional methods on student motivation,” J. Educ. recearch, 2013.
[12] william e Cashin, “students’ ratings of teaching : a summary of the research,” idea Pap., 1990.
[13] P. Freire, pedagogy of the oppressed contium. new york: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc, 2005.
[14] A. F. Mubarok, “Penyesuaian Diri Para Pendatang Di Lingkungan Baru,” J. Sos. Ind. Psychol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2012.
[15] H. Harmen and R. Juita, “Perilaku Lesbian Santri Pondok Pesantren,” Psikis J. Psikol. Islam., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 11, 2017, doi: 10.19109/psikis.v3i1.1219.
[16] K. N. N. Widad and R. Arjanggi, “Hubungan Antara Self Esteem dengan Penyesuaian Diri pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi UNISSULA,” Pros. Konf. Ilm. …, vol. 000, pp. 128–135, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/kimuhum/article/view/17615
[17] A. Asari et al., Pengantar Statistika, vol. 11, no. 1. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI
[18] J. Ilmiah and M. Pendidikan, “Jurnal Ilmiah Mutiara Pendidikan,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2024.
[19] K. Belajar, Y. Oktarina, and L. Marianti, “Penerapan Konseling Kelompok Dengan Teknik Direktif Terhadap,” vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 328–333, 2023.
[20] B. Miller, “Rural students’ experiences with boredom in school,” J. Rural Educ., 2017.
[21] Recruit Will Larson, “The paradox of boredom in school: A multidimensional perspective.,” J. Educ. Psychol., 2016.
[22] J. W. Santrock, Life Span Development. Surabaya: Penerbit Erlangga, 2012.
[23] D. E. Papalia, Menyelami Perkembangan Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2014.
[24] Erik Homburger Erikson, Childhood and Society. W.W. Norton & Company, 1963.
[25] Erik Homburger Erikson, Identity: Youth and Crisis. Harvard University Press, 1968.
[26] J. Piaget, The Construction of Reality in the Child. Basic Books, 1954.
[27] A. Fadillah, O. D. Pranata, and L. Angela, “Analisis Tingkat Kejenuhan Siswa Sebelum, Selama, dan Setelah Pembelajaran Sains,” PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.33369/pendipa.8.1.1-9.
[28] D. Ferdiansah, R. Hartono, and O. D. Pranata, “The Secondary and High School Students’ Boredom in Learning English,” Premise J. English Educ. Appl. Linguist., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 885–910, 2024, doi: 10.24127/pj.v13i3.10261.
[29] Z. Jie, S. Roslan, M. M. Muhamad, M. N. Md Khambari, and Z. Zaremohzzabieh, “The Efficacy of Positive Education Intervention for Academic Boredom and Intrinsic Motivation among College Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013323.
[30] Trisnawati Trisnawati and Diena San Fauziya, “Faktor Penyebab Kejenuhan Belajar Siswa SMP Kelas VIII Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia,” Aliansi J. Hukum, Pendidik. dan Sos. Hum., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 214–226, 2024, doi: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i5.407.
Penulis
- Copyright
Authors who publish their manuscripts in Archetype: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi dan Terapan agree to the following terms and conditions:
- Authors retain copyright over their work and grant the journal the right of first publication, where the work is licensed under a Creative Commons license. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC).
- Authors are permitted to upload articles that have been published (Post-Print or Publisher's PDF versions) to institutional repositories, personal websites, or other media with full attribution and without commercial use.
- Licensing Policy
All content published in Archetype: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi dan Terapan Full Open Access and licensed under:
Lisensi Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY - NC 4.0)
This license permits users to:
- Share : Copying and distributing the material in any media or format.
- Adapt : Remix, modify, and build upon this material.
Provided that users must meet two main requirements:
- BY – Attribution : Users must attribute the work appropriately (credit) and provide a link to the license, as well as indicate if any changes have been made. This must be done in a reasonable manner without implying that the publisher or author endorses you or your use.
- NC – NonCommercial : Users are not permitted to use this material for commercial purposes.
What is meant by Non-Commercial?
Use intended for commercial gain or personal monetary compensation. Use of this journal content must be for educational, research, or non-profit purposes.
Important: This license aims to maximize the dissemination of research while protecting authors' rights from commercial exploitation.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, Authors retain copyright and grant the Archetype : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi dan Terapan and Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya as publisher of first publication right.