Pemahaman NOS di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 pada Mahasiswa PGSD dan Guru Sekolah Dasar

Authors

  • Poppy Anggraeni STKIP Sebelas April Sumedang Indonesia
  • Ari Widodo Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30651/else.v3i2.3293

Abstract

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh gambaran mengenai pemahaman NOS di era revolusi industri 4.0 pada mahasiswa PGSD dan guru sekolah dasar di Kota Sumedang. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu metode survey, dengan sampel sebanyak 128 orang. Instrument yang digunakan yaitu angket online (google form).Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman NOS di era revolusi industri 4.0 pada mahasiswa PGSD dan guru sekolah dasar di Kota Sumedang memiliki kategori tinggi (69.5%). Pemahaman aspek NOS tertinggi berada pada aspek ethos ilmiah (75.2%) dan pemahaman terendah berada pada aspek sains tidak dapat menjawab semua pertanyaan (62.5%). Pemahahaman NOS pada responden yang berjenis kelamin laki-laki, rentang usia 16 s/d 20 tahun, berstatus mahasiswa PGSD, mahasiswa PGSD yang berasal dari SMA/ MA IPS, mahasiswa PGSD pada semester VII IPA, guru yang mengajar di kelas I, dan guru yang memiliki latar belakang S1 kependidikan seluruhnya memiliki persentase yang lebih tinggi, serta berada pada kategori tinggi.

Kata Kunci: NOS, Era Revolusi Industry 4.0

Abstract: This study aims to obtain an overview of the understanding of NOS in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 in PGSD students and elementary school teachers in Sumedang City. The method used is the survey method, with a sample of 134 people. The instrument used is an online questionnaire (google form).The results showed that understanding NOS in the industrial revolution era 4.0 in PGSD students and elementary school teachers in Sumedang City had a high category (69.5%). The highest understanding of NOS aspects is in the aspect of scientific ethos (75.2%) and the lowest understanding in the aspect of science cannot answer all questions (62.5%). Understanding of NOS for male respondents, ages 16 to 20 years, has the status of students, PGSD students who come from SMA / MA IPS, PGSD students in level VII of IPA, teachers who teach in class I, and teachers who have backgrounds Education S1 has a higher percentage and is in the high category.

Keywords: NOS, Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0

References

AAAS. (2010). Exploring the Nature of Science Using the Atlas of Science Literacy and Other Education Resources from AAAS Project 2061. Retrieved from www.aaas.org.

Adi, K. Y., & Widodo, A. (2018). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains Pada Guru dan Siswa Sekolah Dasar. EDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan, 10(1), 55–72.

Clough, M. P. (2018). Teaching and Learning About the Nature of Science, 27:1–5. Sci & Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9964-0.

Digital Science in Horison 2020. (2013). Digital science in Horizon 2020, (March 2013).

Fernandes, G. W. R., & Ferreira, C. A. (2017). Conceptions of the Nature of Science and Technology : a Study with Children and Youths in a Non-Formal Science and Technology Education Setting. Rec Sci Educ, 1071–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9599-6.

Hacieminoglu, E. (2016). Elementary School Students ’ Attitude toward Science and Related Variables, (August). https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.288a.

Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2016). New Directions for NOS Research.

Jumanto, & Widodo, A. (2018). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains Oleh Siswa Dan Guru SD di Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 2, 20–31.

Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “General Aspects†Conceptualization As A Pragmatic And Effective Means To Introducing Students To Nature Of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21305.

Kariadinata, R. (2012). Menumbuhkan Daya Nalar ( Power Of Reason ) Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Analogi Matematika.Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 1(1). Retrieved from https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/45699216/nielsen2012.pdf.

Kelly, R., & Erduran, S. (2018). Understanding Aims And Values Of Science : Developments In The Junior Cycle Specifications On Nature Of Science And Pre-Service Science Teachers ’ Views In Ireland.Irish Educational Studies, 0(0), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2018.1512886.

McComas, W. F., & Nouri, N. (2016). The Nature of Science and the Next Generation Science Standards: Analysis and Critique. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9474-3.

Mercado, C. T., Macayana, F. B., & Urbiztondo, L. G. (2015). Examining Education Students ‘ Nature of Science ( NOS ) Views. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5), 101–110.

Metin, M., Acisli, S., & Kolomuc, A. (2012). Attitude of elementary prospective teachers towards science teaching, 46(October 2015), 2004–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.418.

Mudavanhu, Y., & Zezekwa, N. (2017). The Views of Nature of Science Expressed by In-Service Teachers Who were Learning History and Philosophy of Science. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(3), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/jesr-2017-0003.

Nielsen, K. H. (2012). Scientific Communication and the Nature of Science. Sci & Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9475-3.

Olson, J. K. (2018). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. Science and Education, (1998), 41–52. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.10007/s11191-018-9993-8.

Prasetyo, H., & Soetopo, W. (2018). Industri 4.0: telaah klasifikasi aspek dan arah perkembangan riset. Jurnal Teknik Industri UNDIP, 13(1), 17–26.

UKessay (2018). Merton’s Theory of Scientific Ethos. Diakses dari https://www.ukessays.com/essays/sociology/mertons-theory-scientific-ethos-3626.php.

UNESCO. (2017). Working Group on Education : Digital skills for life and work Working Group on Education : Digital skills for life and work.

UNESCO. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy, (51).

Published

2019-08-31

Issue

Section

Artikel